header-logo header-logo

08 February 2007
Issue: 7259 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

CRIMINAL LITIGATION

Filmer v DPP [2006] EWHC 3450 (Admin), [2006] All ER (D) 08 (Nov)

Whether the trial is in the crown court or the magistrates’ court, the prosecution is not limited in either the questions it asks of its witnesses or the evidence it introduces by the precise wording or content of the disclosed statements, exhibits or other documentation.

The requirement on it is to reveal its case in sufficient detail to enable defendants properly to prepare their defence for trial. Supplementary questions can be asked, and areas can be explored in greater detail than revealed in the disclosed material, so long as the fair trial and natural justice requirements of the case are not breached (per Mr Justice Fulford at para 33).

Issue: 7259 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Simone Ketchell

Browne Jacobson—Simone Ketchell

Browne Jacobson adds top property litigation Partner in record real estate expansion

Fieldfisher—Megan Goodyer

Fieldfisher—Megan Goodyer

Fieldfisher expands Personal Injury team with impressive partner from Stewarts

Clyde & Co—Jack Holling

Clyde & Co—Jack Holling

Global firm strengthens insurance practice with appointment of partner

NEWS
Should every solicitor found to have acted dishonestly face automatic striking off? The answer, argues John Gould, chair of Russell-Cooke LLP in NLJ this week, is no 
Winning an arbitral award against a state is one thing; enforcing it is another
Can government success in court tell us whether the rule of law is healthy? 
Poorly drafted dispute resolution clauses can trigger litigation before the real dispute is even addressed
As cryptocurrency becomes mainstream, family lawyers are increasingly confronting the challenges it creates on divorce
back-to-top-scroll