header-logo header-logo

08 February 2007
Issue: 7259 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

CRIMINAL LITIGATION

Filmer v DPP [2006] EWHC 3450 (Admin), [2006] All ER (D) 08 (Nov)

Whether the trial is in the crown court or the magistrates’ court, the prosecution is not limited in either the questions it asks of its witnesses or the evidence it introduces by the precise wording or content of the disclosed statements, exhibits or other documentation.

The requirement on it is to reveal its case in sufficient detail to enable defendants properly to prepare their defence for trial. Supplementary questions can be asked, and areas can be explored in greater detail than revealed in the disclosed material, so long as the fair trial and natural justice requirements of the case are not breached (per Mr Justice Fulford at para 33).

Issue: 7259 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

Ward Hadaway—19 promotions

19 promotions across national offices, including two new partners

Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

Brabners—Ruth Hargreaves

Partner promoted to head of corporate team

Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

Slater Heelis—Liam Hall, Jordan Bear & Joe Madigan

Chester office expansion accelerates with triple appointment

NEWS
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has reignited debate over what exactly counts as the ‘conduct of litigation’ in modern legal practice
A controversial High Court financial remedies ruling has reignited debate over secrecy, non-disclosure and fairness in divorce proceedings involving hidden wealth
Britain’s deferred prosecution agreement regime is undergoing a significant shift, with prosecutors placing renewed emphasis on corporate cooperation, reform and early self-reporting
The High Court has upheld the Metropolitan Police’s live facial recognition policy, rejecting claims that its deployment unlawfully interferes with privacy and protest rights
As AI chatbots increasingly provide legal and commercial advice, English law is beginning to confront who should bear responsibility when automated systems get things wrong
back-to-top-scroll