header-logo header-logo

15 November 2007
Issue: 7297 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

CRIMINAL LITIGATION

R v Majury; R v Burbridge; R v Parkes [2007] All ER (D) 42 (Nov)

The defendants had committed offences in breach of suspended sentences and the magistrates had purported to commit them to the crown court pursuant to paras 8(6) and 11(2) of Sch 12 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003 for sentence in relation to the suspended sentence and the new offences. 

HELD Para 8(6) only relates to a breach of a suspended sentence order, or a failure to comply with such an order, where the magistrates’ court have the power under para 11 to deal with the defendant in respect of the suspended sentence.

It did not apply to a breach of a suspended sentence order which was passed by the crown court and where the breach of that order was due to the commission of new offences. Paragraph 11(2) does not apply to the new offences which were committed in breach of a suspended sentence order. Accordingly, the crown court did not have the power to deal with the new offences.

Issue: 7297 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Maryam Syed KC, Church Court Chambers

NLJ Career Profile: Maryam Syed KC, Church Court Chambers

From childhood dreams of the Bar to some of the country's most challenging cases, Maryam Syed KC explains why she has never stopped standing up for others

DAC Beachcroft—Richard Breavington, Rachel Ford & Daniel Guilfoyle

DAC Beachcroft—Richard Breavington, Rachel Ford & Daniel Guilfoyle

DAC Beachcroft significantly expands Cyber team, hiring three Cyber partners

Browne Jacobson—Professor Clive Kay

Browne Jacobson—Professor Clive Kay

Browne Jacobson appoints senior healthcare leader Professor Clive Kay as strategic adviser

NEWS
As family justice moves further away from the courtroom, collaborative law is emerging as an increasingly important route to resolving separation disputes
A busy period for employment law is producing important lessons for employers, employees and tribunals alike
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll