header-logo header-logo

CRIMINAL LITIGATION

15 November 2007
Issue: 7297 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

R v Majury; R v Burbridge; R v Parkes [2007] All ER (D) 42 (Nov)

The defendants had committed offences in breach of suspended sentences and the magistrates had purported to commit them to the crown court pursuant to paras 8(6) and 11(2) of Sch 12 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003 for sentence in relation to the suspended sentence and the new offences. 

HELD Para 8(6) only relates to a breach of a suspended sentence order, or a failure to comply with such an order, where the magistrates’ court have the power under para 11 to deal with the defendant in respect of the suspended sentence.

It did not apply to a breach of a suspended sentence order which was passed by the crown court and where the breach of that order was due to the commission of new offences. Paragraph 11(2) does not apply to the new offences which were committed in breach of a suspended sentence order. Accordingly, the crown court did not have the power to deal with the new offences.

Issue: 7297 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll