header-logo header-logo

15 November 2007
Issue: 7297 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

CRIMINAL LITIGATION

R v Majury; R v Burbridge; R v Parkes [2007] All ER (D) 42 (Nov)

The defendants had committed offences in breach of suspended sentences and the magistrates had purported to commit them to the crown court pursuant to paras 8(6) and 11(2) of Sch 12 to the Criminal Justice Act 2003 for sentence in relation to the suspended sentence and the new offences. 

HELD Para 8(6) only relates to a breach of a suspended sentence order, or a failure to comply with such an order, where the magistrates’ court have the power under para 11 to deal with the defendant in respect of the suspended sentence.

It did not apply to a breach of a suspended sentence order which was passed by the crown court and where the breach of that order was due to the commission of new offences. Paragraph 11(2) does not apply to the new offences which were committed in breach of a suspended sentence order. Accordingly, the crown court did not have the power to deal with the new offences.

Issue: 7297 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll