header-logo header-logo

Construction

09 October 2008
Issue: 7340 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Property
printer mail-detail

Multiplex Constructions (UK) Ltd v Cleveland Bridge UK Ltd (No. 6) [2008] EWHC 2220 (TCC), [2008] All ER (D) 04 (Oct)

In construction litigation, an engineer who is giving factual evidence may also proffer:

(i) statements of opinion which are reasonably related to the facts within his knowledge; and

(ii) relevant comments based upon his own experience. If a contractor (D) repudiates at a time when the employer has resolved to remove certain of D’s obligations and has already engaged another contractor to perform those obligations, the court, in assessing damages, should disregard D’s failure to perform those particular obligations. That proposition must apply both as between employer and main contractor and as between main contractor and subcontractor.

The Technology and Construction Court exists to provide a dispute resolution service to the business community and pre-eminently to the construction industry. In many cases, both parties are members of the construction industry and have a dispute about a final account and usually a cross claim for damages. The normal and sensible way of resolving such matters is for the court to decide questions of principle and for the parties then to sort out the financial consequences.

Once the court has decided questions of principle, the parties can save themselves and their shareholders many millions of pounds by instructing their advisers to agree reasonable figures for quantum. If one party is not prepared to negotiate, then the other party can protect its position by making a timely and realistic offer under Pt 36.

The court’s decision on preliminary issues should be used by both parties as a basis for sensible discussion. It should not, however, be used as a platform from which the victor on the preliminary issues launches new and ill thought out claims in order to transform its case on quantum.
 

Issue: 7340 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , Property
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—19 appointments

DWF—19 appointments

Belfast team bolstered by three senior hires and 16 further appointments

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Cadwalader—Andro Atlaga

Firm strengthens leveraged finance team with London partner hire

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Knights—Ella Dodgson & Rebecca Laffan

Double hire marks launch of family team in Leeds

NEWS
The Supreme Court issued a landmark judgment in July that overturned the convictions of Tom Hayes and Carlo Palombo, once poster boys of the Libor and Euribor scandal. In NLJ this week, Neil Swift of Peters & Peters considers what the ruling means for financial law enforcement
Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre makes the case for ‘General Practice Pro Bono’—using core legal skills to deliver life-changing support, without the need for niche expertise—in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Steven Ball of Red Lion Chambers unpacks how advances in forensic science finally unmasked Ryland Headley, jailed in 2025 for the 1967 rape and murder of 75-year-old Louisa Dunne. Preserved swabs and palm prints lay dormant for decades until DNA-17 profiling produced a billion-to-one match
Small law firms want to embrace technology but feel lost in a maze of jargon, costs and compliance fears, writes Aisling O’Connell of the Solicitors Regulation Authority in this week's NLJ
Charlie Mercer and Astrid Gillam of Stewarts crunch the numbers on civil fraud claims in the English courts, in this week's NLJ. New data shows civil fraud claims rising steadily since 2014, with the King’s Bench Division overtaking the Commercial Court as the forum of choice for lower-value disputes
back-to-top-scroll