header-logo header-logo

15 January 2009
Issue: 7352 / Categories: Features , Tribunals , Employment
printer mail-detail

Law digest: Employment law

Aziz-Mir v Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Plc [2008] All ER (D) 102 (Dec)
 

Where a complaint of bias or misconduct on the part of an employment tribunal is raised in the notice of appeal, affidavits or witness statements are obtained from the parties, as are comments on the allegations from the employment tribunal chairman and, if appropriate, lay members. If issues arise as to what happened below the deponents, but not the members of the tribunal, will give evidence before the Employment Appeal Tribunal and be subject to cross-examination. It will then be for the EAT to carry out a fact-finding investigation in order to apply the “fairminded observer” test.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
Can a meticulously maintained spreadsheet turn a couple’s informal financial arrangements into legally enforceable obligations? 
back-to-top-scroll