header-logo header-logo

15 January 2009
Issue: 7352 / Categories: Features , Tribunals , Employment
printer mail-detail

Law digest: Employment law

Aziz-Mir v Sainsbury’s Supermarkets Plc [2008] All ER (D) 102 (Dec)
 

Where a complaint of bias or misconduct on the part of an employment tribunal is raised in the notice of appeal, affidavits or witness statements are obtained from the parties, as are comments on the allegations from the employment tribunal chairman and, if appropriate, lay members. If issues arise as to what happened below the deponents, but not the members of the tribunal, will give evidence before the Employment Appeal Tribunal and be subject to cross-examination. It will then be for the EAT to carry out a fact-finding investigation in order to apply the “fairminded observer” test.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll