header-logo header-logo

13 February 2026
Issue: 8149 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 13 February 2026

Arbitration

The Republic of India v CC Devas (Mauritius) Ltd (in administration) and other companies [2026] EWHC 156 (Comm)

The Commercial Court determined four threshold issues concerning an application under s 45 of the Arbitration Act 1996 brought by the Republic of India against three Mauritian companies. The application sought determination of whether a tribunal seated in England must apply Mauritian law to determine who has authority to instruct lawyers in an arbitration. The court held that: (1) consent to a s 45 application by corporate parties is not limited to representatives recognised by the arbitral tribunal; (2) a s 45 application is not an impermissible challenge to a tribunal’s procedural order; (3) s 45 is not limited to prospective questions of law but can address questions already decided by a tribunal; and (4) s 45 is not ousted merely because the substantive law is international law, as the law of the seat governs procedural matters. The court ruled it had jurisdiction to determine the question of law raised, though made

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—James Inness

Sidley—James Inness

Partner joins capital markets team in London office

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Firm announces appointment of partner as UK general counsel

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Firm appoints first chief marketing officer to drive growth strategy

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll