header-logo header-logo

13 February 2026
Issue: 8149 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 13 February 2026

Arbitration

The Republic of India v CC Devas (Mauritius) Ltd (in administration) and other companies [2026] EWHC 156 (Comm)

The Commercial Court determined four threshold issues concerning an application under s 45 of the Arbitration Act 1996 brought by the Republic of India against three Mauritian companies. The application sought determination of whether a tribunal seated in England must apply Mauritian law to determine who has authority to instruct lawyers in an arbitration. The court held that: (1) consent to a s 45 application by corporate parties is not limited to representatives recognised by the arbitral tribunal; (2) a s 45 application is not an impermissible challenge to a tribunal’s procedural order; (3) s 45 is not limited to prospective questions of law but can address questions already decided by a tribunal; and (4) s 45 is not ousted merely because the substantive law is international law, as the law of the seat governs procedural matters. The court ruled it had jurisdiction to determine the question of law raised, though made

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Arc Pensions Law—Matthew Swynnerton

Chair of the Association of Pension Lawyers joins as partner

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Ampa Group—Kamal Chauhan

Group names Shakespeare Martineau partner head of Sheffield office

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Blake Morgan—four promotions

Four legal directors promoted to partner across UK offices

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll