header-logo header-logo

11 November 2020
Issue: 7910 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 13 November 2020

Damages

Leach v North East Ambulance Service NHS Foundation Trust [2020] EWHC 2914 (QB), [2020] All ER (D) 08 (Nov)

The claimant suffered a subarachnoid haemorrhage, from which she recovered. She brought a claim for damages after she developed a significant Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). The defendant admitted breach of duty to the extent that it was accepted that there had been a 31-minute negligent period of delay in the ambulance arriving at the claimant’s house for the purposes of taking her to hospital. However, it was disputed whether the negligent period of delay had caused, or contributed to, the onset of the PTSD. The Queen’s Bench Division held that the negligent period of delay had made a material contribution to the claimant’s PTSD and that an apportionment exercise was not permissible in those circumstances. Accordingly, judgment was granted in favour of the claimant in the sum of £40,000.


Employment

Nair v Lagardere Sports and Entertainment UK Ltd [2020] EWHC 2608 (QB), [2020] All ER (D) 09 (Nov)

The case concerned

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll