header-logo header-logo

15 May 2026
Issue: 8161 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 15 May 2026

Costs

Friend v Friend Media Technology Systems Ltd [2026] EWHC 1056 (KB)

The King’s Bench Division determined the costs consequences following its earlier judgment dismissing the claimant’s application for summary judgment and strike-out. The claimant, a founder of the defendant company, had sought immediate judgment for £307,641.69 in legal fees pursuant to clause 19.4 of an investment agreement. The court had previously held that clause 19.4 was confined to reimbursement of non-contentious legal advice relating to interpretation and limited enforcement of transaction documents and did not extend to indemnifying litigation costs. The claimant’s application was therefore refused, as was the defendant’s application for reverse summary judgment. On the costs issue, the court held that the defendant was the overall successful party on the application, as the claimant failed to obtain any of the relief sought. However, the court recognised that the claimant succeeded on an important issue of contractual construction, as the court rejected the defendant’s narrow construction that clause 19.4 was confined to advice relating to entry into or variation

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll