header-logo header-logo

16 January 2026
Issue: 8145 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 16 January 2026

Company

Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Purity Ltd [2025] EWHC 3401 (Ch)

The Chancery Division granted HMRC's winding-up petition against Purity Ltd, the first such petition presented under s 85, Finance Act 2022, which permits HMRC to seek the winding-up of tax avoidance scheme promoters when it is expedient in the public interest for the protection of public revenue. The court found Purity was a ‘relevant body’ under s 85 and that it was just and equitable to wind up the company on three grounds: first, Purity's tax avoidance scheme caused substantial tax loss; second, Purity demonstrated lack of transparency to both employees and HMRC; and third, Purity represented a continuation of a similar business previously conducted by Alpha Republic Ltd, which had also been liquidated following HMRC investigation. The court determined that compulsory liquidation was appropriate despite Purity already being in creditors' voluntary liquidation, emphasising the need for full investigation by independent office-holders and to send a clear message to tax avoidance scheme promoters.


Costs

R v Jacob (formerly Oyemola)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll