header-logo header-logo

16 January 2026
Issue: 8145 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 16 January 2026

Company

Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Purity Ltd [2025] EWHC 3401 (Ch)

The Chancery Division granted HMRC's winding-up petition against Purity Ltd, the first such petition presented under s 85, Finance Act 2022, which permits HMRC to seek the winding-up of tax avoidance scheme promoters when it is expedient in the public interest for the protection of public revenue. The court found Purity was a ‘relevant body’ under s 85 and that it was just and equitable to wind up the company on three grounds: first, Purity's tax avoidance scheme caused substantial tax loss; second, Purity demonstrated lack of transparency to both employees and HMRC; and third, Purity represented a continuation of a similar business previously conducted by Alpha Republic Ltd, which had also been liquidated following HMRC investigation. The court determined that compulsory liquidation was appropriate despite Purity already being in creditors' voluntary liquidation, emphasising the need for full investigation by independent office-holders and to send a clear message to tax avoidance scheme promoters.


Costs

R v Jacob (formerly Oyemola)

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll