header-logo header-logo

24 January 2025
Issue: 8101 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 24 January 2025

Adoption

Re X and Y (Children: Adoption Order: Setting Aside) [2025] EWCA Civ 2

The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal and held that there is no jurisdiction at first instance for the High Court to revoke validly made adoption orders, even in exceptional circumstances or on welfare grounds. Adoption orders are ‘transformative’ and intended to be permanent and irrevocable for life, as if the child had been born to the adopter. The only way to challenge an adoption order is through an appeal or in exceptional circumstances amounting to a fundamental breach of natural justice.


Arbitration

Collins and others v Wind Energy Holding Ltd [2025] EWHC 40 (Comm)

This is a claim to set aside a final award. The court held that the arbitrator had not breached her duties under s 33 of the Arbitration Act 1996 by refusing to adjourn the evidential hearing to accommodate issues regarding legal representation and health concerns of the claimants, where the claimants had failed to take proper steps to enable legal representation; admitting

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll