header-logo header-logo

27 February 2026
Issue: 8151 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 27 February 2026

Divorce

LP v MP [2026] EWFC 36

The Family Court determined an application for costs following substantive financial remedy proceedings in which serious findings had been made against the respondent wife. The court held that the wife had treated the High Court with contempt throughout both the financial and children proceedings. Key findings included that the wife failed to attend the first appointment and the pre-trial review, only attending the final hearing; she failed to serve her Form E in advance, serving it 18 days late to the court and over a month late to the husband’s solicitors; she used her Form E to run a false conduct case against the husband, including blaming him for her own criminal fraud convictions; and her responses to questionnaires came without supporting documentation, with oral evidence revealing many narrative answers were deliberately untrue. The court found the wife’s conduct amounted to litigation misconduct warranting severe costs penalties. Applying Azarmi-Movafagh v Bassiri-Dezfouli, the court concluded the wife’s conduct was completely out of the norm

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Kevin Joynes & Neil Gosling

Clarke Willmott—Kevin Joynes & Neil Gosling

Clarke Willmott bolsters housebuilder expertise in Birmingham

Carpmaels & Ransford—Kevin Cordina

Carpmaels & Ransford—Kevin Cordina

Firm adds former Simmons Simmons patent head to engineering and tech team

ACTAPS—Sally Goodger

ACTAPS—Sally Goodger

Freeths strengthens its voice in national disputes with ACTAPS committee appointment

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll