header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 27 June 2025

27 June 2025
Issue: 8122 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Costs

The New Lottery Company Ltd and another company v The Gambling Commission [2025] EWHC 1522 (TCC)

The Technology and Construction Court rejected the applications for security for costs by the defendant Gambling Commission and interested parties to the proceedings. The litigation arose from the Gambling Commission's procurement process for the award of the fourth National Lottery licence which took place between 2019 and 2022. The claimants did not succeed in obtaining the licence and made two claims challenging the fairness of the procurement process and the decision to award the fourth licence to the interested parties, claiming damages of approximately £1.3bn. The court considered two issues: (i) an entirely novel point as to whether the court had the power to award security for costs in favour of an interested party joined to the proceedings in that capacity; (ii) whether a parent company with limited assets may rely upon evidence of its control over a wholly owned subsidiary with substantial assets in order to avoid a determination that an order for security

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Boies Schiller Flexner—Tim Smyth

Firm promotes London international arbitration specialist to partnership

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Katten Muchin Rosenman—James Davison & Victoria Procter

Firm bolsters restructuring practice with senior London hires

HFW—Guy Marrison

HFW—Guy Marrison

Global aviation disputes practice boosted by London partner hire

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
A construction defect claim in the Court of Appeal offers a sharp lesson in pleading discipline. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains how a catastrophically drafted schedule of loss derailed otherwise viable claims. Across the areas explored in this week's column, the message is consistent: clarity, economy and proper pleading matter more than ever
back-to-top-scroll