header-logo header-logo

14 January 2022
Issue: 7962 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Law digests: 7 & 14 January 2022

Human rights

R (on the application of Youssef) v Secretary of State for Foreign, Commonwealth and Development Affairs [2021] EWHC 3188 (Admin), [2021] All ER (D) 17 (Dec)

The Queen’s Bench Division dismissed the claimant’s application for judicial review of the review mechanism for the continuation of asset-freezing scheme provided in the Sanctions and Anti-Money Laundering Act 2018 and the ISIL (Da’esh) and Al-Qaida (United Nations Sanctions) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019 (SI 2019/466). The claimant alleged that the scheme had not allowed him access to a court to review his original listing as a ‘sanctioned person’ by the United Nations Al-Qaida and Taliban Financial Sanctions Committee and the present imposition of the asset-freezing regime, contrary to Arts 6 and 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights (the Convention). The court held that the remedy available under the Act and the Regulations was ‘effective’, in the sense that the court could order the Secretary of State to use her best endeavours to procure the removal of that listing by the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll