header-logo header-logo

Law digests: 7 June 2024

07 June 2024
Issue: 8074 / Categories: Case law , In Court , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Police powers

R (on the application of ­National Council for Civil Liberties) v ­Secretary of State for the Home Department (Public Law Project ­intervening) [2024] EWHC 1181 (­Admin), [2024] All ER (D) 89 (May)

The Administrative Court, in allowing the claimant’s judicial review claim in part, held that the Public Order Act 1986 (Serious Disruption to the Life of the Community) Regulations 2023 (SI 2023/655), which strengthened police powers concerning protests, were unlawful. Sections 12 and 14 of the Public Order Act 1986 (POA 1986) empowered the police to impose conditions on public processions and assemblies if an officer reasonably believed that there would be ‘serious disruption to the life of the community’. The government laid two amendments to the Public Order Bill, which sought to expand the definition of ‘serious disruption’ in POA 1986 to include anything which was ‘more than minor’. However, the House of Lords had rejected one of the amendments. Before the Public Order Act 2023 (POA 2023) had received Royal Assent, the government had then exercised the ‘Henry VIII power’ to amend legislation by secondary

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bloomsbury Square Employment Law—Donna Clancy

Bloomsbury Square Employment Law—Donna Clancy

Employment law team strengthened with partner appointment

mfg Solicitors—Matt Smith

mfg Solicitors—Matt Smith

Corporate solicitor joins as partner in Birmingham

Freeths—Joe Lythgoe

Freeths—Joe Lythgoe

Corporate director with expertise in creative industries joins mergers and acquisitions team

NEWS
The High Court’s decision in Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys has thrown the careers of experienced CILEX litigators into jeopardy, warns Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers in NLJ this week
Sir Brian Leveson’s claim that there is ‘no right to jury trial’ erects a constitutional straw man, argues Professor Graham Zellick KC in NLJ this week. He argues that Leveson dismantles a position almost no-one truly holds, and thereby obscures the deeper issue: the jury’s place within the UK’s constitutional tradition
Why have private prosecutions surged despite limited data? Niall Hearty of Rahman Ravelli explores their rise in this week's NLJ 
The public law team at Herbert Smith Freehills Kramer surveys significant recent human rights and judicial review rulings in this week's NLJ
In this week's NLJ, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley examines how debarring orders, while attractive to claimants seeking swift resolution, can complicate trials—most notably in fraud cases requiring ‘particularly cogent’ proof
back-to-top-scroll