header-logo header-logo

23 October 2014
Issue: 7627 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Lawyers appeal to Peers

The legal profession has presented a united front to call on Peers to urgently amend a Bill that will have a “chilling effect” on judicial review.

The Bar Council, Law Society and Chartered Institute of Legal Executives (CILEx) have warned that Pt 4 of the Criminal Justice and Courts Bill, currently in the House of Lords, will: restrict the use of protective costs orders (PCOs) limiting judicial review to the wealthy; expose people not party to judicial review, including friends, relatives and associates of claimants, to the financial risk of paying costs; discourage helpful contributions made by charities, NGOs and others by making them liable for costs; and shield public bodies from proper scrutiny when they act unlawfully.

Law Society president, Andrew Caplen, says: “The Bill would stop judges from granting PCOs until permission is granted, a stage which in itself requires intensive up-front work by lawyers which incurs costs. Only a handful of PCOs are granted by judges each year as things stand, and only if the case is in the public interest.”

Issue: 7627 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll