header-logo header-logo

Lawyers cross into the new era of generative AI

12 February 2024
Issue: 8059 / Categories: Legal News , Technology , Artificial intelligence
printer mail-detail
One in four legal professionals (26%) are using generative AI tools on at least a monthly basis—up from 11% in July 2023, representing a doubling of usage in six months—while a further 35% have plans in place to use the technology

A report by LexisNexis Legal & Professional, Lawyers cross into the new era of generative AI, published this week, reveals the legal sector’s adoption of AI tools is accelerating rapidly.

LexisNexis surveyed more than 1,200 legal professionals in January 2024, finding 62% of law firms have already made changes to their day-to-day operations as a result of generative AI. Examples of changes made included launching AI-powered products for internal use, providing AI training for staff, hiring AI experts and developing policies on the use of generative AI.

Stuart Greenhill, senior director of segment strategy at LexisNexis, says the appetite for generative AI in the legal sector is ‘unprecedented.

‘Lawyers from all backgrounds are jumping at the chance to make the most of its time-saving potential. However, the demand is growing in the legal sector for generative AI tools that are grounded and trained on legal sources and can provide a higher-level of transparency for all responses generated.’

In terms of the areas legal professionals want to use AI for, nine out of ten respondents wanted to use the technology for time-saving tasks such as drafting documents and for researching matters. Some 73% would use it for communication tasks such as writing emails.

Roughly half the respondents say they anticipate using generative AI for more complex tasks such as contract analytics, case management or real-time comparisons of law across jurisdictions.

Nevertheless, lawyers express concern about potential risks and are therefore eager to find AI that is grounded on trusted legal content and capable of providing transparency for all responses generated.

Chief among the list of concerns is generative AI’s tendency to hallucinate, fabricating answers based on inaccurate information, followed by security issues. As the report notes, AI can ‘leak confidential data and construct biases’.

Despite these fears, however, the majority of respondents—two-thirds overall and 73% from large law firms—said they would be somewhat or completely confident using AI if it were grounded in reliable legal content sources with linked citations to the case, legislation or content informing the response.

According to Rachita Maker, global head of legal ops, tech and consulting at DWF, who is quoted in the report, lawyers can safeguard against hallucinations by relying on trusted datasets.

Maker says: ‘We are using our own documents, which make the output of generative AI significantly more reliable.’

LexisNexis recently launched Lexis+ AI, a generative AI system grounded in the LexisNexis database and providing verifiable authority-backed results. 

View the full report here.

 

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Taylor Rose—nine promotions

Taylor Rose—nine promotions

Leadership strengthened across core practice areas with nine new partners

Fieldfisher—Rebecca Maxwell

Fieldfisher—Rebecca Maxwell

Real estate team welcomes partner inBirmingham

Ward Hadaway—14 trainee solicitors

Ward Hadaway—14 trainee solicitors

Firm strengthens commitment to nurturing future legal talent

NEWS
Government plans for offender ‘restriction zones’ risk creating ‘digital cages’ that blur punishment with surveillance, warns Henrietta Ronson, partner at Corker Binning, in this week's issue of NLJ
Louise Uphill, senior associate at Moore Barlow LLP, dissects the faltering rollout of the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 in this week's NLJ
Judgments are ‘worthless without enforcement’, says HHJ Karen Walden-Smith, senior circuit judge and chair of the Civil Justice Council’s enforcement working group. In this week's NLJ, she breaks down the CJC’s April 2025 report, which identified systemic flaws and proposed 39 reforms, from modernising procedures to protecting vulnerable debtors
Writing in NLJ this week, Katherine Harding and Charlotte Finley of Penningtons Manches Cooper examine Standish v Standish [2025] UKSC 26, the Supreme Court ruling that narrowed what counts as matrimonial property, and its potential impact upon claims under the Inheritance (Provision for Family and Dependants) Act 1975
In this week's NLJ, Dr Jon Robins, editor of The Justice Gap and lecturer at Brighton University, reports on a campaign to posthumously exonerate Christine Keeler. 60 years after her perjury conviction, Keeler’s son Seymour Platt has petitioned the king to exercise the royal prerogative of mercy, arguing she was a victim of violence and moral hypocrisy, not deceit. Supported by Felicity Gerry KC, the dossier brands the conviction 'the ultimate in slut-shaming'
back-to-top-scroll