header-logo header-logo

17 June 2020
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Covid-19
printer mail-detail

Lawyers fear widespread collapse of criminal law firms

The Law Society has urged ministers to provide emergency relief for criminal law firms amid fears several duty solicitor schemes and criminal law firms are at risk of ‘imminent collapse’

Many firms are in dire financial circumstances due to the COVID-19 crisis exacerbating existing difficulties. Law Society figures released this week showed 124 criminal law firms (10% of the total) have closed in the past year. And, while many practitioners hoped the ‘accelerated items’ list―concerns prioritised by the Ministry of Justice (MoJ)―would help, this has fallen short.

Consequently, the Law Society issued an urgent call for help this week, in a supplemental response to the government’s criminal legal aid review.

It called on the MoJ to address firms’ cashflow problems through adjustments to how the Legal Aid Agency (LAA) pays for work; provide relief for law firms from business rates; and immediately reverse the previous cut of 8.75% for criminal legal aid. It urged the MoJ to ‘improve the broader package of accelerated measures and bring to the fore the focus on sustainability in the context of the criminal legal aid review’, and urgently look at the sustainability of the civil legal aid system.

These requests are additional to the Law Society’s main response to the review, in which it called for an increase in rates ‘across the board’, ‘a higher fee for sent cases’ and 100% payment for cracked trials.

‘As a result of the pandemic, work for criminal legal aid firms has fallen through the floor―leaving many hanging on for survival,’ said Simon Davis, Law Society president.

‘Without urgent intervention, there is danger that many more duty solicitor schemes will face imminent collapse. We have made clear since the start of the pandemic that criminal legal aid firms are facing a triple whammy: immediate cashflow problems, short to medium term permanent loss of income, and the pre-existing crisis of sustainability.

‘Unless the government addresses all three, there is a serious risk of widescale market collapse. The accelerated items proposed by government were already insufficient to match the scale of the problem – firms urgently need the funds originally promised, as well as additional support to meet the new crisis.’

Fees for defence practitioners have not increased in cash terms for 25 years. Fewer solicitors are choosing criminal law as a career, which could lead to long-term sustainability issues. Davis said many areas of the country have very few duty solicitors under the age of 35 years, and some duty schemes are unlikely to survive the year. 

Categories: Legal News , Profession , Covid-19
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Taylor Rose—Jessica Draganescu & Emily Hewlett

Taylor Rose—Jessica Draganescu & Emily Hewlett

Firm strengthens growth strategy and group litigation capability with senior hires

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
The legal profession’s claim to be a ‘guardian of fairness’ is under scrutiny after stark findings on gender imbalance and opaque progression. Writing in NLJ this week, Joshua Purser of No5 Barristers’ Chambers and Govindi Deerasinghe of Global 50/50 warn that leadership remains dominated by a narrow elite, with men holding 71% of top court roles
A legal challenge to police disclosure rules has failed, reinforcing a push for transparency in policing. In NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth examines a case where the Metropolitan Police required officers to declare membership of groups like the Freemasons
Bereavement leave is undergoing a quiet but profound transformation. Writing in NLJ this week, Robert Hargreaves of York St John University explains how the Employment Rights Act 2025 introduces a day-one right to leave for a wider range of losses, alongside new provisions for pregnancy loss and bereaved partners
Courts are beginning to grapple with whether AI-generated material is legally privileged—and the answers are mixed. In this week's issue of NLJ, Stacie Bourton, Tom Whittaker & Beata Kolodziej of Burges Salmon examine US rulings showing how easily privilege can be lost
New guidance seeks to bring order to the growing use of artificial intelligence (AI) in expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Minesh Tanna and David Bridge of Simmons & Simmons set out a framework stressing ‘transparency’, ‘explainability’ and ‘reliability’
back-to-top-scroll