header-logo header-logo

17 June 2020
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Covid-19
printer mail-detail

Lawyers fear widespread collapse of criminal law firms

The Law Society has urged ministers to provide emergency relief for criminal law firms amid fears several duty solicitor schemes and criminal law firms are at risk of ‘imminent collapse’

Many firms are in dire financial circumstances due to the COVID-19 crisis exacerbating existing difficulties. Law Society figures released this week showed 124 criminal law firms (10% of the total) have closed in the past year. And, while many practitioners hoped the ‘accelerated items’ list―concerns prioritised by the Ministry of Justice (MoJ)―would help, this has fallen short.

Consequently, the Law Society issued an urgent call for help this week, in a supplemental response to the government’s criminal legal aid review.

It called on the MoJ to address firms’ cashflow problems through adjustments to how the Legal Aid Agency (LAA) pays for work; provide relief for law firms from business rates; and immediately reverse the previous cut of 8.75% for criminal legal aid. It urged the MoJ to ‘improve the broader package of accelerated measures and bring to the fore the focus on sustainability in the context of the criminal legal aid review’, and urgently look at the sustainability of the civil legal aid system.

These requests are additional to the Law Society’s main response to the review, in which it called for an increase in rates ‘across the board’, ‘a higher fee for sent cases’ and 100% payment for cracked trials.

‘As a result of the pandemic, work for criminal legal aid firms has fallen through the floor―leaving many hanging on for survival,’ said Simon Davis, Law Society president.

‘Without urgent intervention, there is danger that many more duty solicitor schemes will face imminent collapse. We have made clear since the start of the pandemic that criminal legal aid firms are facing a triple whammy: immediate cashflow problems, short to medium term permanent loss of income, and the pre-existing crisis of sustainability.

‘Unless the government addresses all three, there is a serious risk of widescale market collapse. The accelerated items proposed by government were already insufficient to match the scale of the problem – firms urgently need the funds originally promised, as well as additional support to meet the new crisis.’

Fees for defence practitioners have not increased in cash terms for 25 years. Fewer solicitors are choosing criminal law as a career, which could lead to long-term sustainability issues. Davis said many areas of the country have very few duty solicitors under the age of 35 years, and some duty schemes are unlikely to survive the year. 

Categories: Legal News , Profession , Covid-19
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll