header-logo header-logo

Lay research

01 December 2011
Issue: 7492 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Lay employment tribunal members add value according to study

Lay members of employment tribunals (ETs) add value to decision-making in unfair dismissal and discrimination cases, according to an independent academic study funded by the Economic and Social Research Council. That was the consensus of ET judges and lay members surveyed for the research. However, less than a quarter of ET judges think lay members add value in “all” jurisdictions. Figures for breach of contract, collective redundancy and TUPE were also low. The government proposed last week that employment judges sit alone in unfair dismissal cases. ET judges valued lay members’ general workplace experience, and their ability to balance legal and workplace perspectives and boost tribunal users’ confidence in the decision-making process.

Issue: 7492 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Birketts—trainee cohort

Birketts—trainee cohort

Firm welcomes new cohort of 29 trainee solicitors for 2025

Keoghs—four appointments

Keoghs—four appointments

Four partner hires expand legal expertise in Scotland and Northern Ireland

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Brabners—Ben Lamb

Real estate team in Yorkshire welcomes new partner

NEWS
Robert Taylor of 360 Law Services warns in this week's NLJ that adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) risks entrenching disadvantage for SME law firms, unless tools are tailored to their needs
Delays and dysfunction continue to mount in the county court, as revealed in a scathing Justice Committee report and under discussion this week by NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School. Bulk claims—especially from private parking firms—are overwhelming the system, with 8,000 cases filed weekly
From oligarchs to cosmetic clinics, strategic lawsuits against public participation (SLAPPs) target journalists, activists and ordinary citizens with intimidating legal tactics. Writing in NLJ this week, Sadie Whittam of Lancaster University explores the weaponisation of litigation to silence critics
Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve charts the turbulent progress of the Employment Rights Bill through the House of Lords, in this week's NLJ
The Court of Protection has ruled in Macpherson v Sunderland City Council that capacity must be presumed unless clearly rebutted. In this week's NLJ, Sam Karim KC and Sophie Hurst of Kings Chambers dissect the judgment and set out practical guidance for advisers faced with issues relating to retrospective capacity and/or assessments without an examination
back-to-top-scroll