header-logo header-logo

Leap of faith?

93548998_4

The use of springboard injunctions by employers is soaring, says Richard Owen-Thomas

In many industries, particularly professional services industries, it is common for employees to defect to competitors, either on their own or in groups, or for employees to set up new business enterprises in competition with their previous employers. Employers will often seek to protect themselves with contractual provisions such as restrictive covenants, but these steps have only been partially successful and have often been viewed as window dressing, unlikely to be enforced by a court more often swayed by the freedom of the worker to exploit his experience; a restrictive covenant will be void except where, in essence, it operates no further than is necessary to protect a legitimate business interest.

Springboard injunctions

In recent years, however, a growing body of authorities has supported employers’ expectations of a high level of loyalty from their current employees so far as future competitive threats are concerned. A powerful tool in the form of so-called “springboard” injunctions is now available

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll