header-logo header-logo

Leap of faith?

93548998_4

The use of springboard injunctions by employers is soaring, says Richard Owen-Thomas

In many industries, particularly professional services industries, it is common for employees to defect to competitors, either on their own or in groups, or for employees to set up new business enterprises in competition with their previous employers. Employers will often seek to protect themselves with contractual provisions such as restrictive covenants, but these steps have only been partially successful and have often been viewed as window dressing, unlikely to be enforced by a court more often swayed by the freedom of the worker to exploit his experience; a restrictive covenant will be void except where, in essence, it operates no further than is necessary to protect a legitimate business interest.

Springboard injunctions

In recent years, however, a growing body of authorities has supported employers’ expectations of a high level of loyalty from their current employees so far as future competitive threats are concerned. A powerful tool in the form of so-called “springboard” injunctions is now available

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll