header-logo header-logo

Leap of faith?

93548998_4

The use of springboard injunctions by employers is soaring, says Richard Owen-Thomas

In many industries, particularly professional services industries, it is common for employees to defect to competitors, either on their own or in groups, or for employees to set up new business enterprises in competition with their previous employers. Employers will often seek to protect themselves with contractual provisions such as restrictive covenants, but these steps have only been partially successful and have often been viewed as window dressing, unlikely to be enforced by a court more often swayed by the freedom of the worker to exploit his experience; a restrictive covenant will be void except where, in essence, it operates no further than is necessary to protect a legitimate business interest.

Springboard injunctions

In recent years, however, a growing body of authorities has supported employers’ expectations of a high level of loyalty from their current employees so far as future competitive threats are concerned. A powerful tool in the form of so-called “springboard” injunctions is now available

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
back-to-top-scroll