header-logo header-logo

Legal advice by video-link: not remotely fair?

24 March 2021 / Dr Jon Robins
Issue: 7926 / Categories: Opinion , Covid-19 , Legal services
printer mail-detail
43903
Jon Robins reports on the potential short-changing of suspects during the COVID pandemic

A duty police station lawyer once described his clients—the ‘lowest level of society’ (his words)—in the following disparaging terms. ‘They are violent, fighting mad, hopelessly intoxicated,’ he wrote. ‘At all times of the day or night, weekend or holiday, we deal with the sad and bad. Cells daubed with excrement, clients vomiting copiously, bleeding, headbanging…’

And what does a solicitor receive for his pains? A fixed fee irrespective of whether they spend one or six hours down the station of somewhere between £126.58 and £274.66 depending on where they are.

Fundamental right

Anyone who is detained or interviewed by the police is entitled to a legal aid lawyer to be physically with them; however that fundamental right, enshrined in the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (PACE), was put on hold last April because of the health risk posed by COVID-19.

In early April 2020, organisations representing solicitors, prosecutors and the police signed

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll