header-logo header-logo

06 January 2011
Issue: 7447 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Legal aid—Inquest

R (on the application of Humberstone) v Legal Services Commission (The Lord Chancellor intervening) [2010] All ER (D) 255 (Dec), [2010] EWCA Civ 1479

The duty to investigate a death under Art 2 of the European Convention on Human Rights applied in a wide range of circumstances in which there was an obligation to provide a legal system by which any citizen might access an open and independent investigation of the circumstances of a death.

The system in England and Wales would always satisfy the procedural investigation obligation. Second, there was a duty proactively to conduct an effective investigation into the circumstances of a death in a much narrower range of circumstances where the evidence suggested a possible breach of the state’s substantive duty to protect the life of those in its direct care (the enhanced investigation).

It was not possible to say that an allegation of individual negligence would never engage Art 2. The person best placed to decide whether Art 2 was engaged was the coroner who was to conduct the investigation. The procedural duty to investigate

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll