header-logo header-logo

17 November 2023 / Roger Smith
Issue: 8049 / Categories: Opinion , Legal aid focus , Profession
printer mail-detail

Legal aid on the Day of the Dead

146641
Roger Smith casts his eye over the options to meet unmet legal need & finds some chinks of light

The Legal Services Consumer Panel chose Halloween, one of the days of the dead, to hold a conference on unmet legal need. Given the dire state of legal aid— which can truly be described as eviscerated—the panel may have revealed more than it intended by its choice of subject. Whatever the origin of the event, some interesting issues emerged.

The first point is why a regulator has any interest in the topic. You might think its point is to impose standards on what is being provided—a role ex post facto—rather than as instigator. The panel has a number of answers to this. After all, improvement of access to justice is included in regulators’ statutory duties. More generally, all regulators are subject to the Public Sector Equality Duty. Further, various suggestions for reform might require regulation. But the essential reason is probably that, with the abolition of the Legal

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll