header-logo header-logo

18 November 2010
Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Legal education

The need to promote social mobility and the likely demands of clients in 2010 will form part of a major review of legal education and training.

The need to promote social mobility and the likely demands of clients in 2010 will form part of a major review of legal education and training.

It is a joint initiative by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), the Bar Standards Board (BSB) and the Institute of Legal Executives & ILEX Professional Standards (IPS).

An external research team will be appointed by the three regulators in February.

The review will examine the academic achievements required by prospective lawyers and their regulatory function; the requirement for education post-qualification, such as CPD, accreditation and quality assurance schemes; and the requirements placed on those delivering education.

It will look at: how the implementation of the Legal Services Act 2007 might affect legal education and training; whether the training of paralegals should be formally regulated; and the issue of career development and mobility between the different branches of the legal profession.  

More specifically, it will ask what the contribution of legal education and training should be in delivering the requlatory objectives of the Legal Services Act 2007, taking account of:

The demands on legal services by 2020 in light of changing client demand, technological change and other factors.

The effect the shape of legal services may have upon the skills required of lawyers.

The need for high quality, competitive legal services and education and training providers and high ethical standards.

The need to promote social mobility and diversity.

Forthcoming changes to the education sector and how these may affect legal education and training.

SRA chief executive, Antony Townsend says: “Ensuring that solicitors and others delivering legal services are properly educated and trained is just as important as making sure that firms and individuals conduct their businesses properly.

“The two areas of regulatory work are complementary and inter-dependant. Much of the recent focus of regulatory activity has been on reforming the structures for regulating legal businesses.

“This review will ensure that serious thought, based on thorough research and comprehensive consultation with all interested parties, is now given to education and training. [It] is bound to produce a more holistic and informed outcome that takes account of the needs of clients and the perspectives of all regulated lawyers.”

Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll