header-logo header-logo

Legal industry turns the tide

Profession remains resilient in the face of COVID-19

Litigation contracted by 21%, but the legal market as a whole shrank just 4.3% in 2020 after a strong bounce-back in the second half of the year, according to LexisNexis’ latest Gross Legal Product (GLP) Index report, supported by the Bar Council.

The detailed report, which tracks legal activity levels, gives a comprehensive insight into the impact of COVID-19 on the legal industry in 2020. It highlights the resilience of the profession as a whole―with employment, corporate, tax, risk and compliance and commercial all up on the previous year―but will concern lawyers in property, immigration, crime and litigation.

In litigation, civil fell furthest with a 35% drop in 2020―it is not possible to measure the backlog of civil cases. Criminal litigation fell 7.1% and the backlog of criminal cases reached a historic high, with many criminal barristers facing financial struggles due to lost earnings.

Employment litigation, on the other hand, rebounded―rising 14% in Q3 and 20% in Q4 compared to 2019. This was driven by several factors, including the redundancy rate, and employment tribunals increased their throughput of cases with remote trials. Family litigation was relatively stable, rising 9% in Q4.

In legal practice, commercial grew by 11% while risk and compliance work increased by 22% and employment rose by more than 6%. Competition work decreased by 10% as global trade and M&As declined. Immigration saw the sharpest fall with work reduced by 47%, followed by property.

The burden of navigating the pandemic has generated advisory work for lawyers, particularly in employment and tax. A boom in restructuring and insolvency work is anticipated but has not yet materialised―according to the report, demand in this practice area had fallen 18% at the end of 2020, perhaps due to government schemes propping up struggling businesses.

Chris O’Connor, head of segment marketing at LexisNexis and co-author of the report, said: ‘While it’s been a difficult year for the industry, the GLP Index demonstrates that many practice areas have bounced back as of Q4 2020.

‘The GLP Index help firms measure their growth against the market, see how they are performing and identify where to focus their efforts.’

Download the report here.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Laytons ETL—Maximilian Kraitt

Commercial firm strengthens real estate disputes team with associate hire

Switalskis—three appointments

Switalskis—three appointments

Firm appoints three directors to board

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Browne Jacobson—seven promotions

Six promoted to partner and one to legal director across UK and Ireland offices

NEWS

From blockbuster judgments to procedural shake-ups, the courts are busy reshaping litigation practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School hails the Court of Appeal's 'exquisite judgment’ in Mazur restoring the role of supervised non-qualified staff, and highlights a ‘mammoth’ damages ruling likened to War and Peace, alongside guidance on medical reporting fees, where a pragmatic 25% uplift was imposed

Momentum is building behind proposals to restrict children’s access to social media—but the legal and practical challenges are formidable. In NLJ this week, Nick Smallwood of Mills & Reeve examines global moves, including Australia’s under-16 ban and the UK's consultation
Reforms designed to rebalance landlord-tenant relations may instead penalise leaseholders themselves. In this week's NLJ, Mike Somekh of The Freehold Collective warns that the Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024 risks creating an ‘underclass’ of resident-controlled freehold companies
Timing is everything—and the Court of Appeal has delivered clarity on when proceedings are ‘brought’. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ, Stephen Gold explains that a claim is issued for limitation purposes when the claim form is delivered to the court, even if fees are underpaid
The traditional ‘single, intensive day’ of financial dispute resolution (FDR) may be due for a rethink. Writing in NLJ this week, Rachel Frost-Smith and Lauren Guiler of Birketts propose a ‘split FDR’ model, separating judicial evaluation from negotiation
back-to-top-scroll