header-logo header-logo

Legal industry turns the tide

Profession remains resilient in the face of COVID-19

Litigation contracted by 21%, but the legal market as a whole shrank just 4.3% in 2020 after a strong bounce-back in the second half of the year, according to LexisNexis’ latest Gross Legal Product (GLP) Index report, supported by the Bar Council.

The detailed report, which tracks legal activity levels, gives a comprehensive insight into the impact of COVID-19 on the legal industry in 2020. It highlights the resilience of the profession as a whole―with employment, corporate, tax, risk and compliance and commercial all up on the previous year―but will concern lawyers in property, immigration, crime and litigation.

In litigation, civil fell furthest with a 35% drop in 2020―it is not possible to measure the backlog of civil cases. Criminal litigation fell 7.1% and the backlog of criminal cases reached a historic high, with many criminal barristers facing financial struggles due to lost earnings.

Employment litigation, on the other hand, rebounded―rising 14% in Q3 and 20% in Q4 compared to 2019. This was driven by several factors, including the redundancy rate, and employment tribunals increased their throughput of cases with remote trials. Family litigation was relatively stable, rising 9% in Q4.

In legal practice, commercial grew by 11% while risk and compliance work increased by 22% and employment rose by more than 6%. Competition work decreased by 10% as global trade and M&As declined. Immigration saw the sharpest fall with work reduced by 47%, followed by property.

The burden of navigating the pandemic has generated advisory work for lawyers, particularly in employment and tax. A boom in restructuring and insolvency work is anticipated but has not yet materialised―according to the report, demand in this practice area had fallen 18% at the end of 2020, perhaps due to government schemes propping up struggling businesses.

Chris O’Connor, head of segment marketing at LexisNexis and co-author of the report, said: ‘While it’s been a difficult year for the industry, the GLP Index demonstrates that many practice areas have bounced back as of Q4 2020.

‘The GLP Index help firms measure their growth against the market, see how they are performing and identify where to focus their efforts.’

Download the report here.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
back-to-top-scroll