header-logo header-logo

16 June 2021
Issue: 7937 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Commercial , Brexit
printer mail-detail

Legal UK looks to Oz following trade deal

Lawyers have welcomed the UK-Australia trade deal but warned ‘practical barriers’ still exist.

The main elements of the trade deal, which could provide a template for future deals, were agreed this week and cover market access for services professionals, tariff-free goods, a cap for 15 years on tariff-free agricultural products and more work visas for people under the age of 35. A final agreement in principle will be published in the coming days. Trade between the UK and Australia is currently worth just £13.9bn and £5.4bn worth of services but the deal is seen as a gateway to the UK joining the Trans-Pacific Partnership.

Law Society president I Stephanie Boyce said the deal could create opportunities for legal professionals.

‘The two countries already have a strong foundation given the long-standing relationship between Australian and the UK legal regulators, representative bodies and professionals,’ she said. 

‘However, there are still practical barriers that prevent the realisation of the full benefit of trade in legal services between our countries. These difficulties increase costs for clients; limit international opportunities for local lawyers; and reduce the skills transfer and contribution to the local market, particularly for those without the support of larger organisations.

‘Before the negotiations, we were clear that it would be beneficial for the legal sector to have a greater variety of business structures—such as the UK LLP—available in both jurisdictions, greater recognition of professional qualifications, regardless of route to qualification and without need for additional study, as well as increased mobility options.

‘On the free flow of data provisions and the ban on data localisation, we urge the UK government to consider the specific characteristics for legal services. Legal professionals follow their own professional obligations.

‘It is important that personal data processed by law firms are well-protected and that the fundamental rights of client confidentiality and legal professional privilege (LPP) are safeguarded in such trade agreements.’

Issue: 7937 / Categories: Legal News , Profession , Commercial , Brexit
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

NLJ Career Profile: Daniel Burbeary, Michelman Robinson

Daniel Burbeary, office managing partner of Michelman Robinson, discusses launching in London, the power of the law, and what the kitchen can teach us about litigating

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

Joelson—Jennifer Mansoor

West End firm strengthens employment and immigration team with partner hire

JMW—Belinda Brooke

JMW—Belinda Brooke

Employment and people solutions offering boosted by partner hire

NEWS

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
In a striking financial remedies ruling, the High Court cut a wife’s award by 40% for coercive and controlling behaviour. Writing in NLJ this week, Chris Bryden and Nicole Wallace of 4 King’s Bench Walk analyse LP v MP [2025] EWFC 473
A €60.9m award to Kylian Mbappé has refocused attention on football’s controversial ‘ethics bonus’ clauses. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law examines how such provisions sit within French labour law
back-to-top-scroll