header-logo header-logo

Less prison, more rehabilitation

03 April 2019
Issue: 7835 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail
Committee calls for abolition of short sentences & criticises government’s ‘crisis management’ approach

Judges in the criminal courts should be given powers to monitor non-custodial interventions and short sentences should be abolished, an 18-month parliamentary inquiry has recommended.

The Justice Committee report, Prison Population 2022, backs justice secretary David Gauke’s calls, made in a speech in February, for an end to short prison sentences, and suggests the government consider abolishing sentences of 12 months or less. It also points out that the judiciary is entitled to expect that those who are subject to probation supervision have good quality interventions and an opportunity to move on with their life. The government, it says, should consider the value of judicial monitoring as a medium-term priority.

The committee’s report found the government’s current approach to prison funding unsustainable in the medium to long-term. The prison population has nearly doubled in size in the past 25 years, from 44,246 in 1993 to 82,384 in December 2018, and many prisons are now overcrowded. This is because proportionately more offenders are being given a custodial sentence and custodial sentences are becoming longer.

The inquiry heard how staffing shortages and other disruptions have severely undermined the delivery of rehabilitative services in prisons, including education, mental health treatment, substance misuse treatment and offending behaviour programmes. The committee concluded that this creates wasted costs.

Moreover, the nature of the prison population has changed―a higher proportion of offenders are in prison for serious violent or sexual offences. The average age is rising, and many prisoners have mental health problems, such as psychosis, or learning disabilities.

Chair of the Justice Committee, Bob Neill MP, said: ‘The Ministry of Justice and Treasury are guilty of a crisis management approach to prisons that has been failing for the past five years.

‘Throwing money at the prison system to tackle multiple issues takes funding away from external rehabilitative programmes that could stem or reverse many of the problems. Proper investment in rehabilitation services would really work.

‘Better access to support and opportunities for offenders would reduce repeat imprisonment, save money, and start to alleviate pressures on jails. Poor access to rehabilitation while in prison creates boredom and frustration, with a cyclical impact on the degradation of regimes and safety.’

Issue: 7835 / Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll