header-logo header-logo

10 December 2009 / Mark Solon
Issue: 7397 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness , Profession
printer mail-detail

To the letter

Mark Solon provides a step-by-step guide to expert reports

Accuracy is essential before the report is served. Here are some key points to check:

l Are the client’s name and address, etc. correct? Clients get upset if they are not.
l Are the basic facts—dates, places, times and locations—correct? Errors here can mislead and look unprofessional.
l Are the instructions completely and accurately summarised?
l Has the expert listed all the material he has relied upon? Is any of it privileged? Has he attached copies to the report?
l Has the expert commented upon all the specific questions and issues relevant to his expertise?
l Are the conclusions and statements of opinion clearly set out and based upon supporting evidence?
l Is the report consistent with other evidence, such as witness statements, documents and the other experts’ reports? If not, why not?
l Is the report dated and signed?

Above all, consider how the report affects the strength of the case and, if necessary, discuss this with the expert before the report is finalised for disclosure.

Explaining the report to the client

Each

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Haynes Boone—Jeremy Cross

Firm strengthens global fund finance practice with London partner hire.

DWF—Stephen Webb

DWF—Stephen Webb

Partner and head of national planning team appointed

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

mfg Solicitors—Nick Little

Corporate team expands in Birmingham with partner hire

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll