header-logo header-logo

Levelling up access to justice (Pt 4)

08 October 2021 / Roger Smith
Issue: 7951 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail
60010
In the final instalment of this series, Roger Smith assesses the state of not-for-profit legal tech at home & abroad

In many countries, not-for-profit agencies play a role in the delivery of access to justice. In the US, such organisations are major deliverers of civil and criminal legal services. Canada and Australia have differing mixes of private and NGO (not for profit, non-government organisation) provision. In England and Wales, though often ignored in discussion of legal aid, the not-for-profit sector plays a valuable and complex role in its delivery—from the national diagnostic and referral work of the Citizens Advice service to the more geographically spotty provision of the roughly 45 law centres still providing representation with poverty law. The deployment of technology in the not-for-profit field follows this patchwork approach.

Not-for-profit organisations are strapped for cash. They do not have the retained profits to invest in technology. Many exist hand to mouth—though their very survival during the Covid pandemic has required them to develop a capacity to work online. This

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll