header-logo header-logo

28 January 2016
Issue: 7684 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

A levy on the City?

Law firms should pay a levy on profits above £150,000 per partner because they “benefit directly from the polarisation of wealth in favour of the businesses they serve”, according to high-profile solicitor Geoffrey Bindman QC.

“This enables them to increase their fees in line with the profits of their clients,” he writes in this week’s NLJ.

The Lord Chancellor, Michael Gove, proposed the idea of a levy on City firms to support legal aid late last year. City firms opposed the idea. Bindman recalls that he suggested such a levy 20 years ago while serving on the Law Society’s pro bono working party.

Bindman argues that, while legal aid is a government responsibility, not all legal aid funding necessarily has to come solely from general tax revenue, and “the case for a contribution from the profession remains”.

He notes that a levy of 10% of profits above £150,000 per partner is “hardly punitive” when profits distributed to Allen & Overy partners, for example, ranged from £712,000 to £2.8m last year.

Issue: 7684 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll