header-logo header-logo

28 January 2016
Issue: 7684 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

A levy on the City?

Law firms should pay a levy on profits above £150,000 per partner because they “benefit directly from the polarisation of wealth in favour of the businesses they serve”, according to high-profile solicitor Geoffrey Bindman QC.

“This enables them to increase their fees in line with the profits of their clients,” he writes in this week’s NLJ.

The Lord Chancellor, Michael Gove, proposed the idea of a levy on City firms to support legal aid late last year. City firms opposed the idea. Bindman recalls that he suggested such a levy 20 years ago while serving on the Law Society’s pro bono working party.

Bindman argues that, while legal aid is a government responsibility, not all legal aid funding necessarily has to come solely from general tax revenue, and “the case for a contribution from the profession remains”.

He notes that a levy of 10% of profits above £150,000 per partner is “hardly punitive” when profits distributed to Allen & Overy partners, for example, ranged from £712,000 to £2.8m last year.

Issue: 7684 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll