header-logo header-logo

17 May 2012 / Clare Arthurs
Issue: 7514 / Categories: Features
printer mail-detail

Liable to be liable?

Clare Arthurs tackles insolvency practitioners & personal liability

Good news for insolvency practitioners (IPs); bad news for disgruntled creditors: the High Court has held that IPs will not be personally liable for the costs of litigation commenced against them.

Round one

In Wright Hassall LLP v Duncan Morris [2012] EWHC 188 (Ch), Morris became administrator of two companies, which were defendants in ongoing litigation (the companies). Wright Hassall LLP (WH) agreed to act, and two conditional fee agreements (CFAs) were entered into: one for the initial advice given, and one for conducting the litigation. The CFAs were addressed to “Mr D Morris, the Redfern Partnership” and (unlike many of the other documents drawn up by both Morris and WH) they did not contain any disclaimer for Morris’ personal liability.

WH issued a claim form for unpaid invoices in March 2009 against Morris and his partner, trading as Redfern Partnership (Redfern). Morris argued that he had retained WH in his capacity as administrator and not in a personal capacity. The contemporaneous correspondence supported

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll