header-logo header-logo

07 July 2016
Issue: 7706 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Libor convictions boost the SFO

Three former Barclays traders have been convicted of Libor fraud—results that will “buoy up” the Serious Fraud Office (SFO) even though questions remain, a senior business fraud solicitor has said.

A jury at Southwark Crown Court found Jonathan Mathew, Jay Merchant and Alex Pabon guilty of conspiracy to defraud in connection with an SFO investigation into the manipulation of US Dollar Libor (the London Interbank Offered Rate) between June 2005 and September 2007. The verdict followed an 11-week trial. Two co-defendants were cleared.

Another man, Peter Johnson, pleaded guilty in October 2014, and in August 2015, former UBS and Citigroup trader Tom Hayes was found guilty of manipulating Libor. That makes five convictions out of 19 individuals charged following the SFO investigation. A further six individuals await trial for the alleged manipulation of EURIBOR on 4 September 2017.

David Corker, partner at Corker Binning, said: “These results will buoy up the SFO but they were desperately needed to save its reputation after the not guilty verdicts in the second Libor trial. Questions do remain though about the way in which the Libor prosecutions were brought after loud political pressure.

“They were about conduct widely condoned or encouraged at the time in a broken, poorly regulated system and these defendants were foot soldiers for the most part in a global financial system beyond their full understanding. The convictions strike the harshest of warnings for those operating at relatively junior levels in financial markets and in other fields of commercial life where the way in which business is routinely done may sometimes, years later, be characterised as criminal by those with 20/20 hindsight and a massive banking crisis for which politicians wanted to find someone to blame.”

Ruth Harris, criminal defence partner at Hodge Jones & Allen, said the convictions “will no doubt be seen as a great success for David Green, director of the SFO, who accepted that his organisation will largely be judged on this investigation. “It will be interesting to see how the SFO proceeds from here, and whether it will continue to expand its investigation or will be satisfied with the convictions as reflecting the state of criminality in this area.”

Issue: 7706 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll