header-logo header-logo

Licensing

30 July 2009
Issue: 7380 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Hall & Woodhouse Ltd v Borough and County of the Town of Poole [2009] EWHC 1587 (Admin), [2009] All ER (D) 226 (Jul)

Section 136(1)(a) of the Licensing Act 2003 was directed at persons who, as a matter of fact, actually carried on or attempted to carry on a licensable activity on or from premises. Though the section was not directed at premises licence holders as such, it would be a question of fact in each and every case as to whether or not a person or body in such position was in breach.

The holder of a premises licence could not be made automatically liable under the section by virtue of the fact that that person or body held a premises licence. The fact that a premises licence holder had an arrangement whereby a third party operated its premises did not alter the position either. Section 136(1)(a) was not a section that established some form of criminal vicarious liability or imputation of criminal conduct: a premises licence holder was not liable under the section as a matter of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

Corker Binning—Priya Dave

FCA contentious financial regulation lawyer joins the team as of counsel

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Hill Dickinson—Paul Matthews, Liz Graham & Sarah Pace

Leeds office strengthened with triple partner hire

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Clarke Willmott—Oksana Howard

Corporate lawyer joins as partner in London office

NEWS
Social media giants should face tortious liability for the psychological harms their platforms inflict, argues Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers in this week’s NLJ
The Leasehold and Freehold Reform Act 2024—once heralded as a breakthrough—has instead plunged leaseholders into confusion, warns Shabnam Ali-Khan of Russell-Cooke in this week’s NLJ
The Employment Appeal Tribunal has now confirmed that offering a disabled employee a trial period in an alternative role can itself be a 'reasonable adjustment' under the Equality Act 2010: in this week's NLJ, Charles Pigott of Mills & Reeve analyses the evolving case law
Caroline Shea KC and Richard Miller of Falcon Chambers examine the growing judicial focus on 'cynical breach' in restrictive covenant cases, in this week's issue of NLJ
Ian Gascoigne of LexisNexis dissects the uneasy balance between open justice and confidentiality in England’s civil courts, in this week's NLJ. From public hearings to super-injunctions, he identifies five tiers of privacy—from fully open proceedings to entirely secret ones—showing how a patchwork of exceptions has evolved without clear design
back-to-top-scroll