header-logo header-logo

30 July 2009
Issue: 7380 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Licensing

Hall & Woodhouse Ltd v Borough and County of the Town of Poole [2009] EWHC 1587 (Admin), [2009] All ER (D) 226 (Jul)

Section 136(1)(a) of the Licensing Act 2003 was directed at persons who, as a matter of fact, actually carried on or attempted to carry on a licensable activity on or from premises. Though the section was not directed at premises licence holders as such, it would be a question of fact in each and every case as to whether or not a person or body in such position was in breach.

The holder of a premises licence could not be made automatically liable under the section by virtue of the fact that that person or body held a premises licence. The fact that a premises licence holder had an arrangement whereby a third party operated its premises did not alter the position either. Section 136(1)(a) was not a section that established some form of criminal vicarious liability or imputation of criminal conduct: a premises licence holder was not liable under the section as a matter of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sackers—Zak Ullah

Sackers—Zak Ullah

Sackers welcomes new associate

Christy Davies—Birmingham Law Society

Christy Davies—Birmingham Law Society

Ward Hadaway lawyer joins Birmingham Law Society Council

Ellisons—Stephanie Westwood & Anisa Khan

Ellisons—Stephanie Westwood & Anisa Khan

Ellisons expands Chelmsford commercial litigation team with two appointments

NEWS
Construction workers injured in comparable accidents can face sharply different routes to compensation on opposite sides of the Atlantic
Victims of undue influence may have more options than simply unwinding a tainted transaction, with courts able to order profits accounts, compensation and, exceptionally, severance
Disabled people could lose vital safeguards following the Supreme Court’s reversal of the Cheshire West test for deprivation of liberty, two barristers warn
A formidable reputation cannot protect a law firm when partner departures, fragile finances and client uncertainty begin feeding each other
Businesses incorporating open-source software into commercial products could face obligations to disclose valuable source code, with AI-assisted development making licensing risks harder to track
back-to-top-scroll