header-logo header-logo

12 February 2009 / Daniel Wise
Issue: 7356 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

The Lindsey legacy

Protectionist measures will turn the recession into a depression, says Daniel Wise

The recent spate of “wild cat” strikes following the Lindsey oil refinery industrial dispute has been described by Professor Ewing, president of the Institute of Employment Rights as a “glimpse into a future where the toxic mix of globalisation and weak labour standards meets economic recession”.
Certainly news of thousands of workers taking part in secondary walkouts across a dozen oil refineries, gas terminals and power stations has provoked extreme reaction from both sides of the political spectrum. Despite the need for Unite not to be perceived as supporting this unoffi cial strike action, joint leader Derek Simpson has been forthright in his criticisms of the European case law and legislation which gave rise to the initial dispute. However, in promulgating statements of support for British workers and their access to British jobs, care must be taken not to ride roughshod over the founding tenets of the EC and to ensure that the principle of economic freedom continues to be protected.

Europe takes a

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll