header-logo header-logo

08 May 2019
Issue: 7839 / Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Brexit , Commercial
printer mail-detail

Litigants prefer London

London’s commercial courts have enjoyed a record year despite the approach of Brexit, with 1,012 litigants from 28 countries. 

US, Russian, Kazakh and Ukrainian litigants were prominent across all 258 cases in 2018/19, according to the Commercial Courts Report, published by Portland Disputes specialist litigation consultants. The number of cases rose 63% on the previous year, and the number of litigants increased by 54%.

The figures are good news for London lawyers, who have expressed concern about other jurisdictions stealing London’s crown post-Brexit. They show that London remains the forum of choice, despite competition from courts such as Singapore International Commercial Court.

Philip Hall, head of Portland’s disputes practice, said: ‘The coming years will be interesting as courts in London and around the world adapt their offers to the changing demands of international businesses in dispute.’

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll