header-logo header-logo

LLPs await tax liability rise

07 January 2014
Issue: 7589 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Salary & equity partners to be impacted by changes to the status of LLP members

Changes to the status of LLP members this year will have “significant” financial consequences for salary and equity partners but there could be an upside, say tax experts. 

HMRC’s partnership tax reform for LLPs is due to come into effect on 6 April 2014, from when many junior, salaried or even equity partners in LLPs will be treated as employees, depending on their share of profits, influence and investment of own capital in the business. 

Dominic Vincent, insolvency partner at Weightmans LLP, says the proposed reform is “an unwelcome reminder to professional practices that despite their best laid plans unexpected financial pressures can still arise in the most efficiently run businesses”.

However, Peter Noyce, head of professional services at accountants Menzies LLP, says: “Re-classifying fixed equity, and perhaps even full equity, partners as employees would add considerably to national insurance costs, but there is a bigger picture to consider.

“Since the introduction of alternative business structures and resultant influx of well capitalised new entrants to the legal services market, the gearing of law firms has become a problem and made it harder for them to compete. However, under the government’s proposals a partner in an LLP will not be deemed as employed if their capital contribution is more than 25% of their expected profit share.

“In the months leading up to 5 April 2014, many partners will choose to inject capital into the LLP to protect their self-employed status. This would immediately give firms a more robust capital base, a stronger balance sheet and improved working capital.

“The proposed tax changes offer a second potential benefit for law firm finances. One of the criteria for avoiding employed status is that partner remuneration should depend on the firm’s profits. This requirement may encourage a more prudent approach to drawings.”

Issue: 7589 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll