header-logo header-logo

07 January 2014
Issue: 7589 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

LLPs await tax liability rise

Salary & equity partners to be impacted by changes to the status of LLP members

Changes to the status of LLP members this year will have “significant” financial consequences for salary and equity partners but there could be an upside, say tax experts. 

HMRC’s partnership tax reform for LLPs is due to come into effect on 6 April 2014, from when many junior, salaried or even equity partners in LLPs will be treated as employees, depending on their share of profits, influence and investment of own capital in the business. 

Dominic Vincent, insolvency partner at Weightmans LLP, says the proposed reform is “an unwelcome reminder to professional practices that despite their best laid plans unexpected financial pressures can still arise in the most efficiently run businesses”.

However, Peter Noyce, head of professional services at accountants Menzies LLP, says: “Re-classifying fixed equity, and perhaps even full equity, partners as employees would add considerably to national insurance costs, but there is a bigger picture to consider.

“Since the introduction of alternative business structures and resultant influx of well capitalised new entrants to the legal services market, the gearing of law firms has become a problem and made it harder for them to compete. However, under the government’s proposals a partner in an LLP will not be deemed as employed if their capital contribution is more than 25% of their expected profit share.

“In the months leading up to 5 April 2014, many partners will choose to inject capital into the LLP to protect their self-employed status. This would immediately give firms a more robust capital base, a stronger balance sheet and improved working capital.

“The proposed tax changes offer a second potential benefit for law firm finances. One of the criteria for avoiding employed status is that partner remuneration should depend on the firm’s profits. This requirement may encourage a more prudent approach to drawings.”

Issue: 7589 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll