header-logo header-logo

27 September 2022
Categories: Legal News , Judicial review , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail

LNB NEWS: Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide 2022 published

HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has published updated guidance for court users in England and Wales conducting judicial review in the Administrative Court. 

Lexis®Library update: The Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide 2022 provides general information on how litigation should be conducted, including the relevant statutory provisions, rules of procedure, practice directions and case law on the procedural aspects of judicial review. The guide also includes contact details for the court, information on forms and fees and current addresses for serving documents on government departments. 

The 2022 edition replaces the 2021 edition, and the large majority of the content is unchanged, but revisions have been made to the main body of the guidance and the annexes. Key changes include the removal of specific provisions concerning coronavirus (COVID-19), the inclusion of a quick reference flow diagram of the judicial review process, the addition of a new section 19 on closed material proceedings, plus new and amended guidance taking account of the Judicial Review and Courts Act 2022 (eg under remedies and procedures where the Upper Tribunal is the defendant).

The guide is intended to apply in the Administrative Court and Administrative Court Offices in England and Wales. It does not have the force of law but parties using the Administrative Court are expected to adhere to it. The guide specifies that applicable rules and cases should be drawn to the court’s attention where relevant, rather than merely relying on the guide.

Note: This edition of the Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide does not take in anticipated amendments removing references to CPR PD 4 (Forms), and updating references necessary to reflect the change of monarch. CPR form amendments have been approved and amended forms will be published in due course. Further details are available here.

Source: Administrative Court judicial review guide 2022

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 26 September 2022 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: www.lexisnexis.co.uk.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Bellevue Law—Lianne Craig

Workplace law firm expands commercial disputes team with senior consultant hire

EIP—Rob Barker

EIP—Rob Barker

IP firm promotes patent attorney to partner

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Muckle LLP—Ryan Butler

Banking and restructuring team bolstered by insolvency specialist

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll