header-logo header-logo

LNB NEWS: Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide 2022 published

27 September 2022
Categories: Legal News , Judicial review , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
HM Courts & Tribunals Service (HMCTS) has published updated guidance for court users in England and Wales conducting judicial review in the Administrative Court. 

Lexis®Library update: The Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide 2022 provides general information on how litigation should be conducted, including the relevant statutory provisions, rules of procedure, practice directions and case law on the procedural aspects of judicial review. The guide also includes contact details for the court, information on forms and fees and current addresses for serving documents on government departments. 

The 2022 edition replaces the 2021 edition, and the large majority of the content is unchanged, but revisions have been made to the main body of the guidance and the annexes. Key changes include the removal of specific provisions concerning coronavirus (COVID-19), the inclusion of a quick reference flow diagram of the judicial review process, the addition of a new section 19 on closed material proceedings, plus new and amended guidance taking account of the Judicial Review and Courts Act 2022 (eg under remedies and procedures where the Upper Tribunal is the defendant).

The guide is intended to apply in the Administrative Court and Administrative Court Offices in England and Wales. It does not have the force of law but parties using the Administrative Court are expected to adhere to it. The guide specifies that applicable rules and cases should be drawn to the court’s attention where relevant, rather than merely relying on the guide.

Note: This edition of the Administrative Court Judicial Review Guide does not take in anticipated amendments removing references to CPR PD 4 (Forms), and updating references necessary to reflect the change of monarch. CPR form amendments have been approved and amended forms will be published in due course. Further details are available here.

Source: Administrative Court judicial review guide 2022

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 26 September 2022 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: www.lexisnexis.co.uk.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Red Lion Chambers—Maurice MacSweeney

Set creates new client and business development role amid growth

Winckworth Sherwood—Charlie Hancock

Winckworth Sherwood—Charlie Hancock

Private wealth and tax offering bolstered by partner hire

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Browne Jacobson—Matthew Kemp

Firm grows real estate team with tenth partner hire this financial year

NEWS
The rank of King’s Counsel (KC) has been awarded to 96 barristers, and no solicitors, in the latest silk round
Neurotechnology is poised to transform contract law—and unsettle it. Writing in NLJ this week, Harry Lambert, barrister at Outer Temple Chambers and founder of the Centre for Neurotechnology & Law, and Dr Michelle Sharpe, barrister at the Victorian Bar, explore how brain–computer interfaces could both prove and undermine consent
Comparators remain the fault line of discrimination law. In this week's NLJ, Anjali Malik, partner at Bellevue Law, and Mukhtiar Singh, barrister at Doughty Street Chambers, review a bumper year of appellate guidance clarifying how tribunals should approach ‘actual’ and ‘evidential’ comparators. A new six-stage framework stresses a simple starting point: identify the treatment first
In cross-border divorces, domicile can decide everything. In NLJ this week, Jennifer Headon, legal director and head of international family, Isobel Inkley, solicitor, and Fiona Collins, trainee solicitor, all at Birketts LLP, unpack a Court of Appeal ruling that re-centres nuance in jurisdiction disputes. The court held that once a domicile of choice is established, the burden lies on the party asserting its loss
Can a chief constable be held responsible for disobedient officers? Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth, professor of public law at De Montfort University, examines a Court of Appeal ruling that answers firmly: yes
back-to-top-scroll