header-logo header-logo

LNB news: Court of Appeal quashes convictions in 39 Post Office cases after CCRC referral

26 April 2021
Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail
The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) has reported that the Court of Appeal has quashed the convictions in 39 Post Office cases that had been referred for appeal by the CCRC
Lexis®Library update: The Court of Appeal held that the Post Office’s failures of disclosure and investigation were ‘so egregious as to make the prosecution of any of the Horizon cases an affront to the conscience of the court’. The CCRC has further outlined that it is aware of ‘several hundred prosecutions’ identified by the Post Office that have been brought since the Horizon system was installed—the Post Office is reviewing those cases to ascertain whether these current appeal proceedings could have implications on those too. Issues with the Horizon computer system are where the grounds for appeals stem, concerning uncertainty of the safety of convictions.

CCRC Chairman, Helen Pitcher, commented on the Court of Appeal decision: ‘This has been a serious miscarriage of justice which has had a devastating impact on these victims and their families. Every single one of these convictions has clearly had a profound and life-changing impact for those involved. Six convictions had already been quashed which had been referred to Southwark Crown Court.

The Post Office has rightly acknowledged the failures that led to these cases and conceded that the prosecutions were an abuse of process. We sincerely hope that lessons will be learned from this to prevent anything similar happening elsewhere in the future.’

The CCRC encourages anyone who believes that their criminal conviction could be unsafe due to the impact of their case of performance issues with the Horizon computer system to consider challenging their conviction.

For more information, see the full judgment: Hamilton and others v Post Office Ltd [2021] EWCA Crim 577.

Source: 39 Convictions Quashed in Post Office Cases

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 23 April 2021 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: https://www.lexisnexis.co.uk/

Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

London firm announces acquisition of corporate team

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Head of corporate appointed following Teesside merger

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Firm expands into banking and finance sector with newly appointed head of banking

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll