header-logo header-logo

26 April 2021
Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-detail

LNB news: Court of Appeal quashes convictions in 39 Post Office cases after CCRC referral

The Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC) has reported that the Court of Appeal has quashed the convictions in 39 Post Office cases that had been referred for appeal by the CCRC
Lexis®Library update: The Court of Appeal held that the Post Office’s failures of disclosure and investigation were ‘so egregious as to make the prosecution of any of the Horizon cases an affront to the conscience of the court’. The CCRC has further outlined that it is aware of ‘several hundred prosecutions’ identified by the Post Office that have been brought since the Horizon system was installed—the Post Office is reviewing those cases to ascertain whether these current appeal proceedings could have implications on those too. Issues with the Horizon computer system are where the grounds for appeals stem, concerning uncertainty of the safety of convictions.

CCRC Chairman, Helen Pitcher, commented on the Court of Appeal decision: ‘This has been a serious miscarriage of justice which has had a devastating impact on these victims and their families. Every single one of these convictions has clearly had a profound and life-changing impact for those involved. Six convictions had already been quashed which had been referred to Southwark Crown Court.

The Post Office has rightly acknowledged the failures that led to these cases and conceded that the prosecutions were an abuse of process. We sincerely hope that lessons will be learned from this to prevent anything similar happening elsewhere in the future.’

The CCRC encourages anyone who believes that their criminal conviction could be unsafe due to the impact of their case of performance issues with the Horizon computer system to consider challenging their conviction.

For more information, see the full judgment: Hamilton and others v Post Office Ltd [2021] EWCA Crim 577.

Source: 39 Convictions Quashed in Post Office Cases

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 23 April 2021 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: https://www.lexisnexis.co.uk/

Categories: Legal News , Criminal
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll