header-logo header-logo

LNB NEWS: Courts and Tribunals Judiciary publishes guidance for Court of Protection closed hearings and closed material

13 February 2023
Categories: Legal News , Court of Protection , Procedure & practice
printer mail-detail
The Courts and Tribunals Judiciary has provided practice guidance for Court of Protection closed hearings and closed material. 

Lexis®Library update: This guidance has been formulated to establish clear procedure in which closed material and closed hearings fall to be considered in the Court of Protection, following the decision in Re A (Covert Medication, Closed Proceedings) [2022] EWCOP 44. The purpose of this guidance is to provide clarity as to the principles to be applied and considerations to be taken into account in the very limited circumstances under which such steps may be appropriate.

According to the guidance:

Closed hearings are hearings from which a party and (where the party is represented) the party’s representative is excluded by order of the court.  For the avoidance of doubt, this is different to a 'private hearing,' which is a hearing at which all the parties are present (or represented), but from which members of the public and the press are excluded.

Closed material is material which the court has determined should not be seen by the party (and/or their representative). 

The practice guidance applies to situations where an order may be made that a party is not to be told of the fact or outcome of a without notice application.

The guidance also outlines the considerations when ordering a closed hearing, procedural matters where an application for a closed hearing has been made and situations where a party is not to be told of the fact or outcomes of a without notice application. With regards to closing material, it considers the consequential steps during the currency of the proceedings.

Read the full guidance here.

Source: Guidance for the Court of Protection: 'Closed hearings' and 'closed material'

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 10 February 2023 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: www.lexisnexis.co.uk.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School and the Frenkel Topping Group—AKA The insider—crowns Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP as his case of 2025 in his latest column for NLJ. The High Court’s decision—that non-authorised employees cannot conduct litigation, even under supervision—has sent shockwaves through the profession. Regan calls it the year’s defining moment for civil practitioners and reproduces a ‘cut-out-and-keep’ summary of key rulings from Mr Justice Sheldon
back-to-top-scroll