header-logo header-logo

02 March 2021
Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Family
printer mail-detail

LNB news: MoJ confirms ‘raft of new amendments’ to Domestic Abuse Bill 2020

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has confirmed that a ‘raft of new amendments’ to the Domestic Abuse Bill 2020 will be presented in Parliament in the week commencing 1 March 2021

Lexis®Library update: Proposals include making non-fatal strangulation a criminal offence, extending the controlling or coercive behaviour (CCB) offence to include abuse where victims and perpetrators no longer live together, and widening the scope of revenge porn laws to include threats to disclose images with intention to cause distress. The new measures were developed closely with peers, advocates and victims, and seek to provide greater protection to victims and further clamp down on perpetrators. The Bill is set to enter report stage next week and expected to receive Royal Assent in the spring of 2021.

Read more about the Domestic Abuse Bill 2020 here.

Proposals for amendments include:

• making non-fatal strangulation a criminal offence, punishable by up to five years imprisonment—it follows concerns that perpetrators were avoiding punishment as the practice can often leave no visible injury and is therefore harder to prosecute under existing offences such as actual bodily harm

• strengthened legislation around CCB, no longer making it a requirement for abusers and victims to live together—it follows a government review which highlighted that those who leave abusive ex-partners can often be subject to sustained or increased CCB post-separation

• widening revenge porn laws to include threats to disclose images with the intention to cause distress, with perpetrators facing up to two years in prison

• providing special measures in civil courts similar to those available in family courts, eg protective screens and giving evidence via video link

• widening the list of evidence to prove abuse has occurred, making it easier for victims who may prefer not to report abuse to avoid being cross-examined in person

• clarifying the use of ‘barring orders’ in the family courts to prevent abusive ex-partners from using it as a form of continuing domestic abuse

• requiring public authorities to send a copy of their completed domestic homicide reviews to the Domestic Abuse Commissioner—this will strengthen the opportunity to learn lessons and prevent future deaths

Source: New laws to protect victims added to Domestic Abuse Bill

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 01 March 2021 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at:  www.lexisnexis.co.uk

Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers—4 Brick Court

42BR Barristers to be joined by leading family law set, 4 Brick Court, this summer

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Winckworth Sherwood—Rubianka Winspear

Real estate and construction energy offering boosted by partner hire

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Gateley Legal—Daniel Walsh

Firm bolsters real estate team with partner hire in Birmingham

NEWS
A wave of housing and procedural reforms is set to test the limits of tribunal capacity. In his latest Civil Way column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold charts sweeping change as the Renters’ Rights Act 2025 begins biting
Plans to reduce jury trials risk missing the real problem in the criminal justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, David Wolchover of Ridgeway Chambers argues the crown court backlog is fuelled not by juries but weak cases slipping through a flawed ‘50%’ prosecution test
Emerging technologies may soon transform how courts determine truth in deeply personal disputes. In this week's NLJ, Madhavi Kabra of 1 Hare Court and Harry Lambert of Outer Temple Chambers explore how neurotechnology could reshape family law
A controversial protest case has reignited debate over the limits of free expression. In NLJ this week, Nicholas Dobson examines a Quran-burning incident testing public order law
The courts have drawn a firm line under attempts to extend arbitration appeals. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed of the University of Leicester highlights that if the High Court refuses permission under s 68 of the Arbitration Act 1996, that is the end
back-to-top-scroll