header-logo header-logo

LNB news: MoJ confirms ‘raft of new amendments’ to Domestic Abuse Bill 2020

02 March 2021
Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Family
printer mail-detail
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has confirmed that a ‘raft of new amendments’ to the Domestic Abuse Bill 2020 will be presented in Parliament in the week commencing 1 March 2021

Lexis®Library update: Proposals include making non-fatal strangulation a criminal offence, extending the controlling or coercive behaviour (CCB) offence to include abuse where victims and perpetrators no longer live together, and widening the scope of revenge porn laws to include threats to disclose images with intention to cause distress. The new measures were developed closely with peers, advocates and victims, and seek to provide greater protection to victims and further clamp down on perpetrators. The Bill is set to enter report stage next week and expected to receive Royal Assent in the spring of 2021.

Read more about the Domestic Abuse Bill 2020 here.

Proposals for amendments include:

• making non-fatal strangulation a criminal offence, punishable by up to five years imprisonment—it follows concerns that perpetrators were avoiding punishment as the practice can often leave no visible injury and is therefore harder to prosecute under existing offences such as actual bodily harm

• strengthened legislation around CCB, no longer making it a requirement for abusers and victims to live together—it follows a government review which highlighted that those who leave abusive ex-partners can often be subject to sustained or increased CCB post-separation

• widening revenge porn laws to include threats to disclose images with the intention to cause distress, with perpetrators facing up to two years in prison

• providing special measures in civil courts similar to those available in family courts, eg protective screens and giving evidence via video link

• widening the list of evidence to prove abuse has occurred, making it easier for victims who may prefer not to report abuse to avoid being cross-examined in person

• clarifying the use of ‘barring orders’ in the family courts to prevent abusive ex-partners from using it as a form of continuing domestic abuse

• requiring public authorities to send a copy of their completed domestic homicide reviews to the Domestic Abuse Commissioner—this will strengthen the opportunity to learn lessons and prevent future deaths

Source: New laws to protect victims added to Domestic Abuse Bill

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 01 March 2021 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at:  www.lexisnexis.co.uk

Categories: Legal News , Criminal , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

London firm announces acquisition of corporate team

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Head of corporate appointed following Teesside merger

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Firm expands into banking and finance sector with newly appointed head of banking

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll