header-logo header-logo

09 March 2021
Categories: Legal News , Procedure & practice , Costs
printer mail-detail

LNB news: MoJ publishes response to alignment of online and paper civil possession fees

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has published the government’s response and impact assessment to the MoJ’s consultation on the subject of the alignment of the fees for online and paper civil money and possession claims, with 22 respondents replying to the consultation

Lexis®Library update: The consultation response notes that a ‘majority of respondents, namely those from the legal and credit sector…disagreed with the proposed alignment’ on the grounds that ‘the proposed fees do not represent the costs of proceedings’ and that the alignment is  ‘unjustifiable in relation to the quality of the service provided’. Indeed, a majority of respondents opposed the principle of enhanced fees.

Despite this, the government has responded that it believes that there is ‘a strong justification to proceed with the alignment of the fees for online and paper civil money and possession claims’. However, as a result of the concerns raised by respondents to the consultation with regards the quality of the county court bailiff enforcement service, especially in relation to ‘the difficulty users of the service currently experience in enforcing warrants in a timely manner, and the potential for increased debt to be passed on to debtors’. As a result of these concerns, the government has decided not to align the £77 online fee with the £110 paper fee for Fee 8.1. Instead, the government intends to introduce a 7.7% inflationary increase backdated to 2016. Online and paper fees will instead be consolidated at £83.

Consequently, the government has decided that fees will be aligned to their correspondent paper level as set out in the consultation, with the exception of Fee 8.1.

The government’s response can be found here.

The impact assessment can be found here.

Source: Alignment of the fees for online and paper civil money and possession claims

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 8 March 2021 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: https://www.lexisnexis.co.uk/

MOVERS & SHAKERS

WSP Solicitors—David Ashcroft & Jessica O’Shea

WSP Solicitors—David Ashcroft & Jessica O’Shea

Commercial property and child law teams expand with senior hires

Duxton Hill Chambers—Lucas Bastin KC & Joshua Hiew

Duxton Hill Chambers—Lucas Bastin KC & Joshua Hiew

Set expands London and Singapore offering with senior international disputes hires

Gilson Gray—Gregor Duthie & Stephen Forsyth

Gilson Gray—Gregor Duthie & Stephen Forsyth

Firm strengthens real estate and litigation teams with partner promotions

NEWS
Behind the profession’s polished exterior, lawyers are ‘internally drained rather than physically tired’, according to a stark assessment of burnout in legal practice
Five years after the Domestic Abuse Act 2021 came into force, concerns remain that the family courts continue to minimise allegations of abuse in child contact disputes
Uber has built a formidable strategy for insulating itself from liability for drivers’ conduct, but the legal terrain differs sharply between the US and England and Wales
The House of Lords (Hereditary Peers) Act 2026 marks a constitutional watershed by severing the centuries-old link between hereditary titles and automatic membership of the upper chamber
The Civil Justice Council’s review of Part III of the Solicitors Act 1974 could mark the end of what one commentator calls an ‘outdated’ and overly technical regime governing solicitor-client fee disputes
back-to-top-scroll