header-logo header-logo

LNB NEWS: MoJ publishes response to consultation on Mental Capacity Small Payments scheme

01 March 2023
Categories: Legal News , Court of Protection , Mental health
printer mail-detail
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has published the government’s response to the consultation, ‘Mental Capacity Small Payments Scheme’, which ran from 16 November 2021 to 12 January 2022. 

Lexis®Library update: This sought views on reforms to accessing limited funds that belong to an individual lacking mental capacity without a lasting power of attorney or a Court of Protection (CoP) order. The MoJ believes that the CoP digital application process and raising awareness of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA 2005) will address the root cause of the problem (operational barriers and lack of awareness). Focus will therefore be on addressing key barriers to accessing payments rather than developing a small payments scheme.

223 responses were analysed. View the government's response here.

While respondents felt there was a need to make improvements to the current CoP application process, there was little consensus on proposals for the design of the small payments scheme, the safeguards required, and withdrawal limits.

The responses indicated two areas as the root cause preventing people from accessing funds on behalf of another individual.

First, a lack of awareness of the need to obtain legal authority to access the funds of another adult, and a lack of awareness of the MCA 2005 more generally.

Second, responses indicated various operational barriers in the current CoP application process. Commonly cited concerns included the length, number and complexity of CoP application forms, the perceived costs of making the application, and the time taken to receive the court order. The government considers that the best way to address these is to work with the CoP to improve the process in property and affairs applications.

The MoJ has decided not to proceed with a small payments scheme but will:

• launch a programme of awareness raising engaging with other government departments, financial service providers and charities

• facilitate the digital application process of the CoP whereby both digital and paper versions of the court forms are being reviewed to streamline and simplify content

Source: Mental Capacity Act: Small Payments Scheme

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 28 February 2023 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: www.lexisnexis.co.uk.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School and the Frenkel Topping Group—AKA The insider—crowns Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP as his case of 2025 in his latest column for NLJ. The High Court’s decision—that non-authorised employees cannot conduct litigation, even under supervision—has sent shockwaves through the profession. Regan calls it the year’s defining moment for civil practitioners and reproduces a ‘cut-out-and-keep’ summary of key rulings from Mr Justice Sheldon
back-to-top-scroll