header-logo header-logo

01 March 2023
Categories: Legal News , Court of Protection , Mental health
printer mail-detail

LNB NEWS: MoJ publishes response to consultation on Mental Capacity Small Payments scheme

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has published the government’s response to the consultation, ‘Mental Capacity Small Payments Scheme’, which ran from 16 November 2021 to 12 January 2022. 

Lexis®Library update: This sought views on reforms to accessing limited funds that belong to an individual lacking mental capacity without a lasting power of attorney or a Court of Protection (CoP) order. The MoJ believes that the CoP digital application process and raising awareness of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA 2005) will address the root cause of the problem (operational barriers and lack of awareness). Focus will therefore be on addressing key barriers to accessing payments rather than developing a small payments scheme.

223 responses were analysed. View the government's response here.

While respondents felt there was a need to make improvements to the current CoP application process, there was little consensus on proposals for the design of the small payments scheme, the safeguards required, and withdrawal limits.

The responses indicated two areas as the root cause preventing people from accessing funds on behalf of another individual.

First, a lack of awareness of the need to obtain legal authority to access the funds of another adult, and a lack of awareness of the MCA 2005 more generally.

Second, responses indicated various operational barriers in the current CoP application process. Commonly cited concerns included the length, number and complexity of CoP application forms, the perceived costs of making the application, and the time taken to receive the court order. The government considers that the best way to address these is to work with the CoP to improve the process in property and affairs applications.

The MoJ has decided not to proceed with a small payments scheme but will:

• launch a programme of awareness raising engaging with other government departments, financial service providers and charities

• facilitate the digital application process of the CoP whereby both digital and paper versions of the court forms are being reviewed to streamline and simplify content

Source: Mental Capacity Act: Small Payments Scheme

This content was first published by LNB News / Lexis®Library, a LexisNexis® company, on 28 February 2023 and is published with permission. Further information can be found at: www.lexisnexis.co.uk.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

Keystone Law—Milena Szuniewicz-Wenzel & Ian Hopkinson

International arbitration team strengthened by double partner hire

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Coodes Solicitors—Pam Johns, Rachel Pearce & Bradley Kaine

Firm celebrates trio holding senior regional law society and junior lawyers division roles

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Michelman Robinson—Sukhi Kaler

Partner joins commercial and business litigation team in London

NEWS
The Legal Action Group (LAG)—the UK charity dedicated to advancing access to justice—has unveiled its calendar of training courses, seminars and conferences designed to support lawyers, advisers and other legal professionals in tackling key areas of public interest law
The Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 transformed criminal justice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ed Cape of UWE and Matthew Hardcastle and Sandra Paul of Kingsley Napley trace its ‘seismic impact’
Operational resilience is no longer optional. Writing in NLJ this week, Emma Radmore and Michael Lewis of Womble Bond Dickinson explain how UK regulators expect firms to identify ‘important business services’ that could cause ‘intolerable levels of harm’ if disrupted
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
back-to-top-scroll