header-logo header-logo

18 June 2009
Issue: 7374 / Categories: Legal News , Local government , Employment
printer mail-detail

Local authority receives depressing decision

A local authority has lost its £1m claim against a chief executive who they claimed failed to disclose previous stress-related illnesses in her job application.

A local authority has lost its £1m claim against a chief executive who they claimed failed to disclose previous stress-related illnesses in her job application.

Cheltenham Borough Council sued its former employee, Christine Laird, for making fraudulent or negligent misrepresentations in a job application, by not disclosing she had previously suffered depression.
However, Mr Justice Hamblen dismissed the application, noting that Laird had correctly filled out the council’s medical questionnaire, which asked: “Do you have either a physical and/or mental impairment?”
Hamblen J said: “She did not have an ongoing depressive disorder...A reasonable person in Mrs Laird’s position at the material time would not regard herself as having a physical or mental impairment.”

Hamblen J rejected a counterclaim for damages by Laird to reflect the value of the work she did for the council during her tenure.

Andrew North, chief executive of the council, is consulting with group leaders and legal advisers on whether or not to appeal the ruling.
A decision will be made early next week.

Issue: 7374 / Categories: Legal News , Local government , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Sidley—James Inness

Sidley—James Inness

Partner joins capital markets team in London office

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Haynes Boone—William Cecil

Firm announces appointment of partner as UK general counsel

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Devonshires—Nicholas Barrows

Firm appoints first chief marketing officer to drive growth strategy

NEWS
A seemingly dry procedural update may prove potent. In his latest 'Civil way' column for NLJ this week, Stephen Gold explains that new CPR 31.12A—part of the 193rd update—fills a ‘lacuna’ exposed in McLaren Indy v Alpa Racing
The long-running Mazur saga edged towards its finale as the Court of Appeal heard arguments on whether non-solicitors can ‘conduct litigation’. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School reports from a packed courtroom where 16 wigs watched Nick Bacon KC argue that Mr Justice Sheldon had failed to distinguish between ‘tasks and responsibilities’

The Court of Appeal has slammed the brakes on claimants trying to swap defendants after limitation has expired. In Adcamp LLP v Office Properties and BDB Pitmans v Lee [2026] EWCA Civ 50, it overturned High Court rulings that had allowed substitutions under s 35(6)(b) of the Limitation Act 1980, reports Sarah Crowther of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ

Cheating in driving tests is surging—and courts are responding firmly. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort Law School charts a rise in impersonation and tech-assisted fraud, with 2,844 attempts recorded in a year
As AI-generated ‘deepfake’ images proliferate, the law may already have the tools to respond. In NLJ this week, Jon Belcher of Excello Law argues that such images amount to personal data processing under UK GDPR
back-to-top-scroll