header-logo header-logo

Local authority receives depressing decision

18 June 2009
Issue: 7374 / Categories: Legal News , Local government , Employment
printer mail-detail

A local authority has lost its £1m claim against a chief executive who they claimed failed to disclose previous stress-related illnesses in her job application.

A local authority has lost its £1m claim against a chief executive who they claimed failed to disclose previous stress-related illnesses in her job application.

Cheltenham Borough Council sued its former employee, Christine Laird, for making fraudulent or negligent misrepresentations in a job application, by not disclosing she had previously suffered depression.
However, Mr Justice Hamblen dismissed the application, noting that Laird had correctly filled out the council’s medical questionnaire, which asked: “Do you have either a physical and/or mental impairment?”
Hamblen J said: “She did not have an ongoing depressive disorder...A reasonable person in Mrs Laird’s position at the material time would not regard herself as having a physical or mental impairment.”

Hamblen J rejected a counterclaim for damages by Laird to reflect the value of the work she did for the council during her tenure.

Andrew North, chief executive of the council, is consulting with group leaders and legal advisers on whether or not to appeal the ruling.
A decision will be made early next week.

Issue: 7374 / Categories: Legal News , Local government , Employment
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll