header-logo header-logo

11 September 2009 / Helen Crossland
Issue: 7384 / Categories: Opinion , Discrimination , Employment
printer mail-detail

Looking the part

comment_9

Lookism in the workplace—discrimination or a fact of life? asks Helen Crossland

It is a commonly held belief that there is now a culture of “lookism” in most workplaces in that staff are recruited, promoted and retained either on an arbitrary view of their attractiveness or on the basis of how their appearance best matches the image their employer wishes to present. While such a culture is unlikely to be acknowledged openly in the majority of workplaces, case law shows that job applicants and employees are being discriminated against on the basis of how they look.

There is strong statistical evidence that women who wear make-up in business get better jobs and are promoted more quickly. More surprising were the results of a recent survey by Personnel Today in which 81% thought it was acceptable to make fun of people’s ginger hair while more than 70% considered blonde hair, regional accents, baldness and shortness to be acceptable topics of banter.

The issue of lookism in the workplace has been highlighted by the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll