header-logo header-logo

15 February 2012
Issue: 7501 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Lord Chancellor & judicial appointment

Lord Chancellor should follow JAC's lead on judicial appointment

The Lord Chancellor should keep out of the process of judicial appointment until names are advanced by the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC), human rights organisation Justice has said.

The Ministry of Justice consultation, Appointments and Diversity, published in November last year, proposed that the Lord Chancellor participate in the appointments process for a number of senior judicial roles. This would overturn the division of responsibilities established by the Constitutional Reform Act 2005.

Roger Smith, Justice’s director, said: “There has to be an appropriate and transparent division of responsibilities. The JAC should decide on a list of no more than three names of those who are suitable for appointment with an indication of who they prefer. At that point, the Lord Chancellor should choose.”

Issue: 7501 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll