header-logo header-logo

Losing out on the lost years

11 May 2018 / David Regan
Issue: 7792 / Categories: Features , Child law , Damages
printer mail-detail
nlj_7792_regan

Child claimants as well as adults should be able to recover damages for ‘lost years’, says David Regan

  • Argues that child claimants should be able to recover damages for loss of earnings (lost years).

Few aspects of the law relating to damages for serious personal injury have caused as much confusion and are as poorly understood as claims for ‘lost years’. In such cases, damages are awarded to a living claimant whose life has been shortened by a tort, for the loss of earnings in the time where, but for the tort they would have been alive. The law as it currently stands has evolved in an uncertain fashion, so that at present adult claimants are able to recover such damages while child claimants cannot. This situation is illogical to the degree that it verges on bringing the law into disrepute. Both the Court of Appeal and an increasing number of High Court decisions have lamented it, but the Supreme Court has yet to have an opportunity to consider the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll