header-logo header-logo

Losing the right to arbitrate

19 July 2007 / James Levy
Issue: 7282 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

An arbitration agreement is a contract just like any other, argues James Levy

The question in Downing v Al Tameer Establishment [2002] EWCA Civ 721, [2002] All ER (D) 342 (May), was whether or not the issuing of court proceedings amounted to an acceptance by the claimant of a repudiatory breach by the defendant of the arbitration agreement.

In Downing, the claimant alleged that there was an underlying contract between the claimant and the defendant, which contained an arbitration agreement. A dispute arose between the parties under the underlying contract. The claimant, on a number of occasions, attempted to invoke the arbitration procedure set out in the arbitration agreement. That procedure required the parties to agree to the appointment of the individual arbitrators that would make up the tribunal. In response the defendant asserted, and continued to assert throughout, that he was not a party to the underlying contract—and, by implication, the arbitration agreement contained within that underlying contract.

After much correspondence, the claimant accepted the defendant’s repudiatory breach of the underlying

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll