header-logo header-logo

Losing the right to arbitrate

19 July 2007 / James Levy
Issue: 7282 / Categories: Features , Commercial
printer mail-detail

An arbitration agreement is a contract just like any other, argues James Levy

The question in Downing v Al Tameer Establishment [2002] EWCA Civ 721, [2002] All ER (D) 342 (May), was whether or not the issuing of court proceedings amounted to an acceptance by the claimant of a repudiatory breach by the defendant of the arbitration agreement.

In Downing, the claimant alleged that there was an underlying contract between the claimant and the defendant, which contained an arbitration agreement. A dispute arose between the parties under the underlying contract. The claimant, on a number of occasions, attempted to invoke the arbitration procedure set out in the arbitration agreement. That procedure required the parties to agree to the appointment of the individual arbitrators that would make up the tribunal. In response the defendant asserted, and continued to assert throughout, that he was not a party to the underlying contract—and, by implication, the arbitration agreement contained within that underlying contract.

After much correspondence, the claimant accepted the defendant’s repudiatory breach of the underlying

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Solicitors are installing panic buttons and thumb print scanners due to ‘systemic and rising’ intimidation including death and arson threats from clients
Ministers’ decision to scrap plans for their Labour manifesto pledge of day one protection from unfair dismissal was entirely predictable, employment lawyers have said
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll