header-logo header-logo

Losing the farm in a family feud

27 June 2019 / Jennifer Haywood
Issue: 7846 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate , Property
printer mail-detail

Jennifer Haywood uncovers some valuable lessons on proprietary estoppel from recent Court of Appeal decisions

  • How courts satisfy the equity in proprietary estoppel cases.
  • Explores three recent Court of Appeal cases where parties fell out over the family farm.

Farming families have given rise to a rich vein of proprietary estoppel cases, and the question of how to satisfy the equity in such cases is often particularly troublesome. Lessons can be drawn from three such cases which reached the Court of Appeal in recent years, Davies v Davies [2016] EWCA Civ 463; Moore v Moore [2018] EWCA Civ 2669 and Habberfield v Habberfield [2019] EWCA Civ 890.

The legal principles which apply in proprietary estoppel cases are, save for a controversy about the aim to be achieved when seeking to satisfy the equity, fairly well established, and they were encapsulated by Lord Justice Lewison at para [38] of Davies. In short:

(i)The ingredients necessary to raise an equity are (a) an assurance of sufficient clarity;

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Anne-Marie Ottaway, HFW

NLJ Career Profile: Anne-Marie Ottaway, HFW

Anne-Marie Ottaway, partner at HFW, discusses her varied career, including 13 years at the Serious Fraud Office, and making the leap to private practice

Carey Olsen—Arindam Madhuryya

Carey Olsen—Arindam Madhuryya

Corporate and investment funds lawyer promoted to partner in Jersey

Jackson Lees—Jennifer Carr

Jackson Lees—Jennifer Carr

Private family team announces appointment of senior associate

NEWS
The government’s landmark Employment Rights Act 2025 met its pre-Christmas deadline, ushering in sweeping changes to the law
Barristers and advocates in Scotland, England and Wales, Northern Ireland and the Republic of Ireland have urged the government to drop its proposals for judge-only ‘swift courts’ in cases where the sentence is three years or less
The practice guidance on non-molestation orders has been updated and replaced, and guidance issued on protective injunctions
Criminal silk Kirsty Brimelow KC, of Doughty Street Chambers, has taken over the reins at the Bar Council, succeeding family silk Barbara Mills KC
Lawyers have welcomed the government’s long-awaited announcement of legislation to reverse PACCAR but warned plans for light-touch regulation could cause delays
back-to-top-scroll