header-logo header-logo

04 December 2019
Issue: 7867 / Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-detail

Love, marriage & divorce

The number of divorces per year has fallen below 10,000 for the first time since the 1970s, prompting family lawyers to renew calls for marriage reform.

Official National Statistics (ONS) show a 10.6% reduction since 2017 to 90,871 opposite-sex couples in 2018.

However, Neil Russell, partner at Seddons, said: ‘This has to be put into context with the fact that the number of cohabiting couples has increased by 25.8% over the decade.

‘This is the fastest growing family type. Without cohabiting couples having any proper financial provision available on breakup this remains a big problem. The biggest myth is that there is a “common law spouse”―there is no such thing.’

Another reason for the decrease is that divorce centres processed an administrative backlog in 2018, resulting in 8% more petitions, which is likely to mean a higher number of completed divorces in 2019.

Matthew Brunsdon-Tully, partner at Forsters, said: ‘No doubt some practitioners will also speculate that some petitions may have been delayed in the increasingly underfunded court system.

‘A standout figure, as in previous years, is that the most common reason for couples divorcing in 2018 was unreasonable behaviour (46.3% of opposite sex divorces and 76.2% of same sex divorces), followed by two years' separation (26.8% and 19.3% of opposite sex and same sex divorces respectively).’

‘No-fault’ divorce took a step closer to happening in June when then Justice Secretary David Gauke introduced the Divorce, Dissolution and Separation Bill to the House of Commons. However, the Bill has been put on ice pending the outcome of the General Election.

Joanna Farrands, partner in the family team at Barlow Robbins said: ‘This once again emphasises the need to reform the law as so many couples are forced to raise behaviours at the outset when it may be a mutual decision to end the divorce.’

Issue: 7867 / Categories: Legal News , Family
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Kennedys—Milan Devani

Chief information officer appointment strengthens technology leadership

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Maguire Family Law—Hannah Barlow & Sophie Hughes

Firm strengthens Wilmslow team with two solicitor appointments

DWF—Ian Plumley

DWF—Ian Plumley

Londoninsurance and reinsurance practice announces partner appointment

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll