header-logo header-logo

12 January 2017 / Adrian Jack
Issue: 7729 / Categories: Opinion , Profession
printer mail-detail

A low benchmark?

nlj_7729_jack

Judicial recruitment is in crisis, says Adrian Jack

A shocking shortfall in recruitment to the High Court and circuit benches is revealed in the latest submissions of the Judicial Appointments Commission (JAC) to the Senior Salaries Review Body (SSRB). Of 14 vacancies in High Court in the most recent competition, only eight could be filled. Of 55 vacancies for circuit judges, only 44 appointments could be made. Further, in 2015 the SSRB noted that the number of “outstanding” candidates for the High Court was dropping.

In that year, for the first time, the JAC was unable to find even a “selectable” candidate to fill a Family Division vacancy, let alone an “outstanding” or “strong” applicant. The 2016 High Court competition was much worse. Only six out of ten vacancies in the Queen’s Bench Division and one out of three in the Family Division could be filled. The one post in the Chancery Division was filled. Moreover, there were only 56 applications in 2016, as against 73 (for fewer vacancies) in 2015.

Quality assessment

Further it

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll