header-logo header-logo

Low morale in magistrates’ courts

11 June 2025
Issue: 8120 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail
Magistrates are resigning from office due to poor working conditions and lack of support and recognition, the Magistrates Association (MA) has warned

In a report published last week, 'Magistrates matter: a plan to ensure magistrates are valued, appreciated and recognised', the MA details its members’ experiences. All unpaid volunteers, they face a lengthy appointments process—sometimes up to two years—report ‘haphazard’ IT training, face frequent last-minute cancellations, cold court buildings and often encounter delays when reclaiming expenses

Mark Beattie JP, national chair of the MA, said volunteer magistrates handle more than 90% of all criminal cases and ‘without them, the system would grind to a halt.

‘However, magistrates are disregarded, neglected, undervalued and often out-of-pocket. While their overwhelming motivation for performing the role is to contribute to their community, and many have been happy to do so despite the lack of appreciation, a lack of support, financial strain, time pressures and insufficient recognition all make volunteering as a magistrate increasingly difficult.’

‘The government has said that, with the current strain in the justice system, magistrate numbers must increase—and sharply—from the current 14,000 to over 20,000,’ Beattie said. ‘However, the hidden costs of service outlined in our report are making it harder to recruit and retain magistrates, particularly from underrepresented groups, such as people from lower socio-economic backgrounds, those aged under 35, people with school-age children, or caring commitments to elderly and/or disabled relatives, and people in full-time employment.’

The report makes seven recommendations, including properly recording volunteering hours, holding recognition events led by Lord-Lieutenants, introducing a ten-year long-service medal and creating a volunteer charter codifying rights and responsibilities.

The MA also calls for a Magistrates’ Attitude Survey similar to the Judicial Attitude Survey, structured opportunities for feedback and a ‘multi-year recruitment and retention strategy’ with targets, long-term forecasting and career development pathways. 
Issue: 8120 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll