header-logo header-logo

03 October 2011
Issue: 7488 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

LSC overspend £51m on legal aid

National Audit Office criticises the Legal Services Commission's mistakes

The Legal Services Commission (LSC) has been criticised by auditors after it overpaid legal aid providers by more than £51m this year.

Applicants who were ineligible or whose eligibility could not be proven were paid £21.2m and £29.5m was wrongly paid out due to solicitors’ errors. The overpayment equates to just over two per cent of the LSC’s total expenditure.

This is the third year running that the National Audit Office (NAO) has qualified the Community Legal Service Fund and Criminal Defence Service accounts. Last year, the LSC overpaid by an even higher amount—£76.5m.

During the course of the year, the LSC recovered more than £7m of overpayments made to legal aid firms, 50% more than last year.

Amyas Morse, head of the NAO, says: “While the LSC has made considerable progress, it still faces difficulties in reducing the level of error in payments to legal services providers.”

On a more positive note, the LSC reduced its administration spend by 8.4%, funded more than 2.7 million “acts of assistance”, and beat its target to make one million legal help acts of assistance via face-to-face or telephone advice.

Sir Bill Callaghan, chairman of the LSC, says: “The NAO acknowledges that the LSC has made substantial improvements in reducing the amount of overpayments made to legal aid practitioners.

“To make further improvements that respond to the NAO’s recommendations, the LSC will continue to concentrate on strengthening its financial management through its internal financial stewardship programme.”

Law Society chief executive, Desmond Hudson, said: “The system remains too complex and susceptible to errors—all the more unacceptable when every possible penny should be spent on improving access to justice.”

Issue: 7488 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll