header-logo header-logo

LSC overspend £51m on legal aid

03 October 2011
Issue: 7488 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

National Audit Office criticises the Legal Services Commission's mistakes

The Legal Services Commission (LSC) has been criticised by auditors after it overpaid legal aid providers by more than £51m this year.

Applicants who were ineligible or whose eligibility could not be proven were paid £21.2m and £29.5m was wrongly paid out due to solicitors’ errors. The overpayment equates to just over two per cent of the LSC’s total expenditure.

This is the third year running that the National Audit Office (NAO) has qualified the Community Legal Service Fund and Criminal Defence Service accounts. Last year, the LSC overpaid by an even higher amount—£76.5m.

During the course of the year, the LSC recovered more than £7m of overpayments made to legal aid firms, 50% more than last year.

Amyas Morse, head of the NAO, says: “While the LSC has made considerable progress, it still faces difficulties in reducing the level of error in payments to legal services providers.”

On a more positive note, the LSC reduced its administration spend by 8.4%, funded more than 2.7 million “acts of assistance”, and beat its target to make one million legal help acts of assistance via face-to-face or telephone advice.

Sir Bill Callaghan, chairman of the LSC, says: “The NAO acknowledges that the LSC has made substantial improvements in reducing the amount of overpayments made to legal aid practitioners.

“To make further improvements that respond to the NAO’s recommendations, the LSC will continue to concentrate on strengthening its financial management through its internal financial stewardship programme.”

Law Society chief executive, Desmond Hudson, said: “The system remains too complex and susceptible to errors—all the more unacceptable when every possible penny should be spent on improving access to justice.”

Issue: 7488 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll